Abordagem experimental sobre a contribuição do vento e de vetores animais na dispersão e colonização de amebas testáceas (Protista, Amoebozoa) em ecossistemas de água doce
alb
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
Acta Limnol. Bras.
2179-975X
Associação Brasileira de Limnologia
Resumo:
Objetivo
Buscamos entender como as amebas testáceas se espalham em novos locais, avaliando seu potencial de dispersão pelo vento e por animais em ecossistemas de água doce.
Métodos
Realizamos um experimento de campo durante 33 dias entre julho e agosto de 2018. O estudo incluiu quatro abordagens diferentes: (i) um grupo controle exposto exclusivamente ao vento, (ii) a adição de propágulos dispersos por Odonata (insetos aquáticos), (iii) a adição de propágulos dispersos por anfíbios, e (iv) a adição combinada de propágulos de ambos os animais.
Resultados
Detectamos um total de 13 espécies de amebas testáceas. Em termos de riqueza de espécies, observamos um aumento constante ao longo do período experimental. Em termos de abundância, observou-se uma tendência semelhante, com diferenças no tratamento de todos os vectores combinados, quando comparados os tratamentos com somente vento, e da combinação do vento com os vetores de forma isolada, indicando uma possível colonização progressiva destes organismos no novo ambiente aquático. Relativamente à composição das amebas testadas, não foram detectadas diferenças significativas entre tratamentos dentro de cada período ou entre os diferentes tratamentos ao longo da experiência.
Conclusões
Nossos resultados demonstram a importância dos vetores animais no transporte de cistos de amebas testáceas.
1. Introduction
The interest in studying the mechanisms that dictate the dispersal processes of biological communities has intensified with the need to understand how communities are structured (Cochak et al., 2021). Species can disperse through sites in an active and/or passive way (Bilton et al., 2001; Parry et al., 2024). Active dispersal involves the organisms' own movements (such as birds, amphibians and flying insects), while passive dispersal relies on external agents, known as vectors, to transport the organisms (Foissner et al., 2011).
Many physical and biological factors act as effective vectors in the passive dispersion of organisms, such as the flow of water in freshwater ecosystems (Padial et al., 2014), the action of the wind that efficiently disperses resistant forms of microorganisms between environments and the facilitated dispersion by animals transporting living organisms and forms of resistance (Incagnone et al., 2015; Cochak et al., 2021). These vectors assist in disseminating aquatic organisms by transporting them to new areas, extending their geographic distribution and promoting the colonization of new ecosystems. Understanding the role of these vectors is critical to understanding how aquatic microorganisms are dispersed and established in different environments.
To gain insights into the dispersion patterns of aquatic microorganisms within a novel ecosystem, it is crucial to examine their capacity for passive dispersal (Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003). Various organisms are recognized as agents facilitating the dispersal of freshwater organisms through a phenomenon referred to as "phoresy", where individuals from different species form an association wherein one carries the other (Foissner et al., 2011; Incagnone et al., 2015; Pilatti et al., 2024). Many organisms visit water bodies during their migrations or daily activities. Consequently, they can transport propagules of aquatic species, especially microorganisms, to new habitats (Bohonak & Whiteman, 1999). This is especially true when it comes to amphibians (Bohonak & Whiteman, 1999; Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008) and aquatic insects, such as Odonata (Cochak et al., 2024). Amphibians and Odonata are important dispersers of microorganisms in freshwater environments, mainly due to their frequent contact with water, thus facilitating the transportation of propagules to different locations, making dispersal more effective (Weisse, 2008; Cochak et al., 2024). Although dispersal is critical for colonizing new habitats, the dispersion process becomes effective only after the propagules successfully establish themselves as active cells or resting stages (cysts) (Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003; Weisse, 2008; Weisse, 2024). In addition, adaptations to local environmental conditions also restrict the colonization of new habitats, as individuals from an established population may not adapt to habitats with different environmental conditions (Balkau & Feldman, 1973; Leturque & Rousset, 2002).
Dispersal strategies involve morphological, behavioral, and physiological aspects (Bowler & Benton, 2005). Microorganisms, due to their minimal sizes (Smith et al., 2008), can form resistance and dormancy cysts, which are dormant stages of the cell, showing no measurable metabolism, usually at low physiological activity, where they are enveloped by a highly protective covering (Dallimore, 2004). Dormancy allows microorganisms to survive in unfavourable environmental conditions and act as dispersal propagules, as described for many biological groups (Van Damme & Sinev, 2013; Dumont & Negrea, 2002). It is their main strategy because they are easily transported by different physical and biological vectors over short and long distances, making dispersal more effective (Weisse, 2008; Heino, 2013). This encystment enables long-distance dispersal, requesting a capacity for passive transport and survival during the time needed for the transport, allowing the dispersion of microorganisms, such as those of the Phylum Rhizopoda (Bruni et al., 2024).
Microorganisms of the Phylum Rhizopoda, such as testate amoebae, are widely distributed in freshwater ecosystems. The testate amoebae are organisms characterized by the presence of a carapace (also called a shell) and short generation times, which allow rapid reproduction in response to environmental changes, facilitating the recovery of their communities from a disturbed state (Ndayishimiye et al., 2024). They play a relevant ecological role, participating in herbivory and detritivore chains (Gimenes et al., 2004; Zagumyonnaya et al., 2023). In freshwater ecosystems, they can colonize different compartments (such as the planktonic, benthic or periphytic) and habitats (such as rivers, lakes, wetlands, ponds) and may be associated with phytotelmata, such as some bromeliad species (Velho et al., 2003).
We evaluated the influence of physical (i.e., anemochory, by wind) and biological vectors (i.e., zoochory, defined in this study by Amphibians and Odonata) in the dispersal of testate amoebae. That said, this work represents an advance in the understanding of the dispersal process by different vectors in the testate amoebae community. More specifically, our objectives were: i) experimentally investigate the relative efficiency of wind and different animal vectors in the passive dispersal of the testate amoebae community; ii) investigate the attributes of richness, abundance, and species composition of testate amoebae according to each dispersal vector individually and together, evaluating how the community changes over time. We expected that: (i) the presence of propagules from biological vectors would lead to increased richness and abundance values as well as differences in species composition compared to dispersal mediated by wind, (ii) the composition of the testate amoebae community differs between wind and animal vectors, (iii) the greater the diversity of biological vectors (that is, considering the three vectors together), the greater and more efficient would be the change in abundance, richness and composition of the testate amoebae community over the time.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental design
We conducted our experiment on the left bank of the Paraná River (PR, Brazil), at the Advanced Base of the Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura (Nupelia), in the Municipality of Porto Rico (PR, Brazil). Our experiment lasted over 33 days between July and August 2018.
We used a total of 128 artificial microcosms of polyethylene containers, with a capacity of one liter. The artificial microcosms were randomly placed on wooden pallets adapted for the experiment, approximately 30 cm from the ground and exposed to the open air (Figure 1). Each microcosm was filled with 800 ml of water collected from the Paraná River, previously filtered through GF/C (Whatman) fiberglass filters, which retain particles larger than 1.2 µm, so that no organism or form of resistance was present in the microcosms. The distance from the installed microcosms to the river was approximately 3 meters. With this, water filtration sought to remove all organisms and avoided the possibility of having testate amoebae alive before the experiment. Due to water filtration, sediments were not present in the microcosms.
Figure 1
Schematic model of experimental design. W = Wind; W + A = Wind + Amphibian; W +A + O =Wind, Amphibian and Odonata; W + O = Wind + Odonata.
We carried out eight samplings during 33 days: day zero (at the beginning of the experiment; T0), one (T1), three (T3), seven (T7), 12 (T12), 19 (T19), 26 (T26) and 33 (T33; last day of the experiment). We removed 4 replicates of the same treatment from each day sampled, totaling 16 microcosms per sampling day (4 replicates x 4 treatments = 16 microcosms). Because we employed an experiment with a destructive approach to microcosms, the number of microcosms decreased with each sampling event (from 128 to 16 artificial microcosms).
A square tent open on four sides was set up over the experimental units to prevent precipitation from causing dilution or even overflow of the microcosms. The side openings of the tent were open enough to allow wind action and the arrival of testate amoebae propagules carried by anemochory (wind) (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Disposition of the microcosms in a random way, being covered by a tent to avoid dilution and homogenization of the samples by possible rains.
The microcosms were divided and randomized into four distinct treatments: i) Control (wind, or "W"); ii) Wind + Amphibian (abbreviated later as "W+A"), iii) Wind + Odonata ("W+O"); and iv) Wind + Amphibian + Odonata ("W+A+O"), which were covered with 500 µm netting to prevent contamination of any other insects during the experimental time. For the biological vector treatments, two vectors were used, one from the class Amphibia and one from the class Odonata. For the Amphibia class, individuals of the species Scinax fuscovarius (Lutz, 1925; Anura: Hylidae) were handled, and for the Odonata class vectors, individuals of Pantala flavescens (Fabricius, 1798). In the case of amphibians, we obtained a license from the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation - CONCEA (CEUA No. 9995190118).
For the capture of animal vectors (Odonata and Amphibia), the collections were carried out based on an active search for individuals throughout the area adjacent to the Advanced Base in Porto Rico (PR, Brazil). Dragonflies were captured during the day using entomological nets. Due to the nocturnal behavior of amphibians, they were captured during the night and later isolated in sterilized plastic pots and adapted to keep them until the next morning, when the procedure for obtaining the propagules from both amphibians and dragonflies was carried out. The pots containing the amphibians were also washed to prevent propagules from sticking to their interior. All individuals collected, both Amphibians and Odonata, were washed separately in filtered water with the aid of cotton swabs, used to carefully scrape the animals' skin, in order to remove all possible propagules adhered to the animals' body surface. Considering that dispersal is a random phenomenon and that the number of individuals arriving in natural aquatic environments varies over time, the number of individuals captured for washing and subsequent addition of propagules in the experimental mesocosms ranged from a minimum of 1 individual to a maximum of 10 individuals of each vector, per day. Therefore, the maximum number captured during the experimental period was 10 individuals of each vector. After this procedure, the animals were returned to nature
To simulate the dispersal process, the water obtained from each vector was placed in their respective treatments with the aid of a graduated syringe, and this water was homogenized before addition. For the isolated treatments of each animal vector (W+A and W+O), 10 mL of water from vector washing were added while for the combination of the two biological vectors (W+A+O), 5 mL of water of each vector were added to the treatment. In order to standardize the effect of adding water in the experiment, 10 mL of filtered water was added to the control treatment. This procedure occurred daily, from the beginning to the end of the experiment, based on the same method used by Cochak et al. (2021). The volume of water used (10mL) was standardized to avoid possible bias in the samples (Figure 1).
To ensure the availability of nutrients and food resources for the establishment and development of testate amoeba populations in the microcosm, 20 microliters of a mixture of Nitrogen (NO3-: 27500 mg/L) and Phosphorus (PO43-: 5250 mg/L) were added every two days until the end of the experiment.
2.2. Laboratory analysis
On each sampling day, we homogenized all the water in each microcosm (800 mL) and concentrated in 100 mL through a plankton net with a 10μm mesh. Each sample was fixed with alkaline lugol, formaldehyde buffered with calcium borate and sodium thiosulphate (Sherr & Sherr, 1993), and stored in an appropriate place. Subsequently, we used a common optical microscope (model Olympus CX31) to count and identify the testate amoebae.
At each sampling, we used 9 mL to count the organisms, using a Sedgewick-Rafter slide (with a volume of 3 mL). The 9 mL were separated into 3 aliquots containing 3 mL each. Of these 3 aliquots, 2 of them were quantitative analyses, by homogenizing the sample and superficial collection of water. Finally, the last aliquot was used for qualitative analysis of the sample, using the water contained in the bottom of the sample, enabling the identification of species that were sedimented at the bottom of the container with the water. We identified the testate amoebae found at the lowest possible taxonomic levels (genus or species) using specialized literature (Gomes & Souza, 2008; Lansac-Tôha et al., 2000, 2001, 2007; Velho et al., 2003).
2.3. Statistical analysis
The difference in testate amoebae species richness and abundance was assessed: i) within each treatment over time, and ii) between each treatment at a given time using a Two-way ANOVA (Two-Way Analysis of Variance). The assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity were tested (considering as significance values of p > 0.05); with this, homoscedasticity and normality were achieved, allowing the analysis of variance to be carried out. When significant differences were found, we performed Tukey's post-hoc test (HSD).
To check for differences in species composition between treatments, we conducted the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination method with the Bray-Curtis distance measure being applied to the species abundance data matrix. Then, we used a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; Anderson, 2005) to test for statistical differences in the observed compositional patterns, using sampling times and treatments as factors, compared to each other. Considering that at the beginning of the experiment many replicates of each treatment did not record any species of testate amoebae (which made analyses unfeasible), the difference in species composition was analyzed only from day 19 of the experiment (T19). We took this time as a basis because only from this time onwards were the results viable and significant. A species accumulation curve was made to observe the arrangement of species among the treatments.
All analyses were performed with the R 4.1.2 software (R Core Team, 2024) using the vegan (Oksanen et al., 2017) and tidyverse packages (Wickham et al., 2019). The vegan package assists in the description of ecological analyses such as diversity analysis, dissimilarity analysis, and community ordering (Oksanen et al., 2013), while the tidyverse package was used to handle the data and ggplot2 was employed to perform the graphics (Wickham, 2016). All Two-Way ANOVA results with p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.
3. Results
We recorded thirteen species of testate amoebae, belonging to five different families, with the family Centropyxidae being the most species-rich, with five species (Table 1). Among all the species recorded, 10 of them occur in all the treatments analyzed. However, the species Euglypha polylepis, Euglypha acantophora and Sphenoderia australis chardezi were only observed in specific treatments (Table 1). Considering all treatments, it was observed through a species rarefaction a low stabilization of species richness from T19 (Figure 3).
Table 1
List of testate amoebae species found in each treatment during the experiments.
TREATMENTS
Family
Species
W
W+ O
W+A
W+A+O
Difflugidae
Netzelia gramen
*
*
*
*
Difflugia minuta
*
*
*
*
Difflugia sp.
*
*
*
*
Centropyxidae
Centropyxis ecornis
*
*
*
*
Centropyxis cassis
*
*
*
*
Centropyxis platysoma
*
*
*
*
Centropyxis minuta
*
*
*
*
Cyclopyxis sp.
*
*
*
*
Euglyphidae
Euglypha polylepis
*
*
*
Euglypha acantophora
*
*
*
Trinematidae
Trinema lineare
*
*
*
*
Trinema enchelys
*
*
*
*
Sphenoderidae
Sphenoderia australis chardezi
*
W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
The asterisk (*) represents the presence of the species in that experimental treatment.
Figure 3
Rarefaction curve of estimated richness of testate amoebae species containing all treatments as a function of sampling time. Gray= Wind, Orange= Wind + Odonata, Purple= Wind + Amphibian, Yellow= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
We observed an increase in richness (Figure 4) and abundance (Figure 5) of the testate amoebae throughout the time, with more notable values starting at day 12. The accumulation of testate amoebae species over time, for the different vectors, was considerably consistent, since new species were recorded at each sampling time, and more species were added in treatments with biological vectors.
Figure 4
Variation of the richness of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment, where the central line denotes the mean values. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata. The bars represent, respectively, the smallest and largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below the percentage limits and the points indicate outliers in treatments.
Figure 5
Variation of the abundance of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment, where the central line denotes the mean values. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata. The bars represent, respectively, the smallest and largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below the percentage limits and the points indicate outliers in treatments. Abundance data were logarithmized.
We observed significant variations in species richness primarily attributed to time, further influenced by the specific treatment types (Table 2). Notably, the most pronounced differences were observed at T12 and T33. The Tukey HSD post-hoc test highlighted these differences across nearly all treatments. The largest significant variations were found between the 'Wind + Odonata' (highest values) and 'Wind ' only vector treatments, underscoring the temporal impact on species richness.
Table 2
Two-Way Analysis of Variance (Two-Way ANOVA) for differences in species richness between treatments, at each time point. Variation in the richness of the Testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment.
Two-way ANOVA
RICHNESS
Df
SS
MS
F value
P
Treatments
3
36.01
12.01
2.351
0.078
Time
6
726.3
121.06
23.69
<0.001
Treatments × Time
18
234.7
13.04
2.552
0.002
Residuals
81
413.9
5.11
p values indicate significance at p<0.05, Df = degrees of freedom, SS = sum of squares, MS = mean square.
For the abundance of testate amoebae (Table 3), the patterns were very similar to those described for richness. Such variations in abundance became also more expressive after time T12, considering that in the first days of the experiment the values of this attribute were extremely low (Figure 5).
Table 3
Two-Way Analysis of Variance (Two-Way ANOVA) for differences in species abundance between treatments, at each time point. Variation of the abundance of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment.
Two-way ANOVA
ABUNDANCE
Df
SS
MS
F value
Pr(>F)
Treatments
3
6632
2211
2.833
0.043
Time
6
161742
26957
34.542
<0.001
Treatments ×Time
18
71260
3959
5.073
<0.001
Residuals
79
61653
780
p values indicate significance at p<0.05, Df = degrees of freedom, SS = sum of squares, MS = mean square, F value = ratio of mean squares, Pr = P value.
We observed significant differences in testate amoebae abundance between treatments only at T33 (p<0.05). The results of Tukey's post-hoc test (HSD) showed significant differences for the treatments of the Wind, Amphibian, and Odonata vectors over the dispersal performed by the respective vectors separately. The results of Tukey's post-hoc (HSD) test evidenced that these differences, as well as for richness, were significant, especially between the initial and final days of the experiment.
We found a similar species composition of testate amoebae among the vectors (Figure 6). Regarding sampling periods, we found a marginally significant difference at times T19 and T33 for the treatment of Wind, Amphibian, and Odonata vectors together (Table 4). Differently for the PERMANOVA analyses of the sampling days between treatments, no significance was obtained in the results of the differentiations of treatments between the final days of the experiment. Thus, the community attributes are repeated among the treatments, with no dominance among the biological vectors and with species similarities in the samples (Table 5).
Figure 6
Sorting by the Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) method based on the composition of the Testate amoebae community between different times and treatments. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
Table 4
Results of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 999 permutations using the attributes of the testate amoebae community in relation to the times.
PERMANOVA BETWEEN TIMES
TREATMENTS
Times
W
W+O
W+A
W+A+O
F
p
F
p
F
p
F
p
T19-T26
0.1679
0.427
0.1966
0.347
0.1524
0.464
0.1549
0.364
T19-T33
0.1482
0.517
0.1545
0.417
0.1294
0.635
0.2233
0.052
T26-T33
0.1402
0.551
0.0680
0.790
0.1282
0.577
0.207
0.640
W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
Table 5
Results of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 999 permutations using the attributes of the testate amoebae community in relation to the treatments.
PERMANOVA BETWEEN TREATMENTS
TIMES
Treatments
T19
T26
T33
F
p
F
P
F
p
W-W+A
-0.277
1
1.3086
0.226
0.1456
0.933
W-W+O
0.7889
0.556
1.0229
0.457
0.2834
0.804
W-W+A+O
1.1705
0.537
1.2309
0.371
1.1815
0.404
W+A-W+O
0.4705
0.926
1.495
0.26
-0.1979
0.968
W+A-W+A+O
0.8048
0.636
1.0415
0.464
0.7644
0.488
W+O-W+A+O
1.0257
0.486
0.2165
0.909
0.4697
0.779
W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata, F value = ratio of mean squares, Pr = P value.
4. Discussion
We found in our experiment 13 species already found in other studies in the Paraná River, its left bank, and its floodplain (Lansac-Tôha et al., 2000, 2001, 2007; Velho et al., 2003). The first testate amoebae observed at time 1 (T1) was the species Netzelia gramen, which symbiotically associates with Zoochlorella algae, providing energy produced by photosynthetic processes, which may influence the distribution of the group at lower levels of the food chain (Gimenes et al., 2004). Also, this species possesses a protective carapace. Its presence at the beginning of the experiment was not expected since the first experimental days were characterized only by the presence of bacteria in the microcosms. The algae-testate amoebae symbiosis may have facilitated the propagation and presence of this species in the experiment, which may suggest the presence of this species in the later sampling days. It was unexpected that a protist species would occur at T1 of the experiment in a treatment made to observe wind dispersion, since it has a low chance of occurrence. This may have been possible due to the great randomness of dispersion by air current or by a sample contamination process through other entry routes. The high richness and abundance of individuals from the Centropyxidae may be related to its high dominance in lotic environments (Velho et al., 1999), such as the site of our experiment. The site of our experiment was very close to the Paraná River, allowing the entry of new propagules of testate amoebae from this environment.
Previous studies have shown that the colonization dynamics of microorganisms in different environments generally follow a predictable model, i.e. an ecological succession of species, the primary phase of which generally exhibits the following pattern: initially, bacteria colonize, followed by diatoms and flagellated autotrophic protists (usually within ten days), then ciliated protists and, finally, larger species with a broader feeding spectrum, such as testate amoebae (Zhang et al., 2012, 2013; Wang et al., 2016). This pattern, observed by the increase in testaceous amoeba species from the subsequent times of the experiment, may corroborate this, being caused by the colonization of the new environment and the success of dispersal mediated by different vectors between sites, which can occur via the passive dispersal of cysts in water (Padial et al., 2014) or the action of biological vectors, such as wind transport over long distances and between different aquatic ecosystems (Allen, 2007). The recorded presence of small omnivorous testate amoebae, such as those from the genera Euglypha and Trinema, suggests that feeding habits may influence smaller species to develop better, stabilizing in the environment over the course of the sampling times, assimilating available food. This was observed in the current study, where omnivorous species from the described genera established themselves in the microcosm from the midpoint of the experiment onwards. The presence of aquatic bacteria, algae, fungi, and rotifers can serve as food for testate amoebae, for instance, those from the genera Centropyxis, Difflugia, and Euglypha (Ndayishimiye et al., 2023), which were found in this study. Concurrently, testate amoebae from the genera Trinema and Euglypha, being of small size, can be carried by the wind, which is why they were present in all experimental treatments.
According to our findings, biological vectors represent an important route for the dispersal of testate amoebae. Several studies corroborate the importance of amphibians as dispersal vectors for freshwater invertebrates (Bohonak & Whiteman, 1999; Lopez et al., 2005; Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008). Since amphibians have a large body area and mucous skin, providing some moisture, more species are able to support transport through this vector, due to their frequent contact with the aquatic environment, transporting the propagules to other habitats (Bohonak & Whiteman, 1999; Vanschoenwinkel et al., 2008).
Odonata also showed an important role in the dispersion of testate amoebae. This is due to the frequent contact of these organisms with different aquatic ecosystems, allowing the capture and/or deposition of propagules (Parsons et al., 1966). Thus, Odonata, which is a good flyer when adult, represents an important component of passive dispersal of freshwater microorganisms (Russo et al., 2006), making them a potential vector for determining the structure of these communities. The fact that they are flying organisms increases the possibility that propagules are dispersed over long distances (Rundle et al., 2007). Cochak et al. (2021) also showed in their study that Odonata played an important role in the transport of many species of ciliated protists, and some species were exclusively transported by this vector.
The fact that the species composition was relatively similar among the treatments (‘Wind’, ‘Wind + Amphibian’, ‘Wind + Odonata’ and ‘Wind + Amphibian + Odonata’), especially after T26, suggests that the vectors are probably dispersing the same species at certain times in the succession. This repetition of species in the final stages may be due to the animal vectors coming into contact with different environments, taking the testate amoeba species from one place to another; in addition, the wind alone can carry these species between sites (Wanner et al., 2015).
It is possible that the dispersal of testate amoebae species is facilitated by their high abundance in the various habitats of river-floodplain systems (Velho et al., 2013; Negreiros et al., 2017), which may serve as a source of propagules. In general, the observed patterns of species composition, abundance, and richness also support the hypothesis that community attributes vary temporally and across vectors (Cochak et al., 2021). The temporal pattern observed for species richness, with an increase in values at the end of the experiment, may be due to the greater effect of ecological succession, increasing the richness of species between treatments and showing the appearance of species as time increases. It can be assumed that there is an increase in the amount of food between the final treatments, which increases the abundance and richness of species.
The higher abundance and species richness values and differences in species composition for treatments containing the combination of all the vectors ('Wind + Amphibian + Odonata') may be related to the high dispersal rates, which ultimately facilitated the process of species colonization and establishment (Leibold et al., 2004). When propagule pressure is very intense, the chances of species colonizing an environment increase (Incagnone et al., 2015). Thus, the entry of new species can quantitatively impact community dynamics through a factor known as mass effects (Diniz et al., 2021). Although the spatial scale of vector sampling was limited, the high number of viable propagules suggests that the dispersal of testate amoebae mediated by biological vectors entails a dispersal of species into local habitats, and increased richness and abundance of organisms is possible if the experiment is continued by increasing the sampling time (and, if possible, increasing the presence of new vectors). In general, water bodies attract a significant number of vector organisms and play a significant role in the colonization of microorganisms through biological vectors.
In addition to dispersal as a determining factor in structuring the community, biotic factors, such as biotic interactions, can have a strong influence on group dynamics. Over time, especially in the final stages, the phenomenon of dispersal can be characterized by fewer new propagules arriving. This is due to since there is already an established community in the environment, together with occurrence of biotic processes, such as species interactions (Godsoe et al., 2015; Zhong et al., 2017). The water aging over the experimental period, may have influenced the change in the pattern of species distribution to wind-mediated dispersal treatments, with communities changing over time (Gonzalez et al., 2012). Ecological selection caused by abiotic and biotic factors can control microbial fitness through changes in community composition and relative species abundance (Ndayishimiye et al., 2023). Stochastic processes, species interactions, or priority effects may affect the diversity of testate amoebae, altering the number of individuals or species in the community (Wang et al., 2020). In natural ecosystems, each site can act as a distinct environmental filter due to its physical, chemical, and biological specificities. This can influence the responses of individuals arriving there and reduce the effect of dispersal, resulting in the selection of species adapted to these conditions (Diniz et al., 2021). This mechanism may explain our findings, especially towards the end of the experiment. The arrival of zooplanktonic organisms may be structuring the community differently in the final time treatments, being able to prey on protists or compete with them for the same food resource (Oliveira et al., 2019).
5. Conclusion
Our first prediction that the presence of biological vectors would lead to an increase in abundance and richness and a change in the species composition of testate amoebae compared to wind-mediated dispersal alone was partially accepted since we found higher values of community richness and abundance in treatments associated with vectors, in particular, with all associated vectors (‘W+A+O’). In the study, local dispersal dynamics were intense when mediated by wind in combination with biological vectors such as amphibians and Odonata ('W+A+O'). This partially corroborates the second and third hypotheses, which predicted that in treatments that included both biological vectors, changes in the attributes of the testate amoebae community would be greater and more efficient, especially in the final days of the experiment. Functional characteristics of testate amoebae, such as forms of resistance, are efficiently dispersed to new environments by the vectors analysed in this study. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the wind, as a physical vector acting in the species dispersal, has a great influence on random dispersion, a characteristic to be considered in future studies that address this topic.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for funding this research, the Protozooplankton Laboratory for its support and teaching, the Center for Research in Limnology, Ichthyology, and Aquaculture (NUPELIA) of the Universidade Estadual de Maringá, which provided all the support and infrastructure necessary for the study, and Atsler Lehun, Lidiany Doreto and Matheus Baumgartner for their help in creating the species accumulation curve.
Cite as: Matos, M.H.O. et al. Experimental approach on the contribution of wind and animal vectors in the dispersal and colonization of testate amoebae (Protista, Amoebozoa) in freshwater ecosystems. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 2025, vol. 37, e1. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-975X2324
Data availability
Research data analyzed in this study is not publicly available by any mean.
References
Allen
M.R.
2007
Measuring and modelling dispersal of adult zooplankton
Oecologia
153
1
135
143
17375330
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0704-4
Allen, M.R., 2007. Measuring and modelling dispersal of adult zooplankton. Oecologia 153(1), 135-143. PMid:17375330. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0704-4.
Anderson
M.J.
2005
PERMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance.
Auckland, NZL
Department of Statistics, University of Auckland
Anderson, M.J., 2005. PERMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Auckland, NZL: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland.
Balkau
B.
Feldman
M.W.
1973
Selection for migration modification
Genetics
74
1
171
174
17248608
http://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/74.1.171
Balkau, B., & Feldman, M.W., 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74(1), 171-174. PMid:17248608. http://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/74.1.171.
Bilton
D.T.
Freeland
J.R.
Okamura
B.
2001
Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates: mechanisms and consequences
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
32
1
159
181
http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114016
Bilton, D.T., Freeland, J.R., & Okamura, B., 2001. Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates: mechanisms and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32(1), 159-181. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114016.
Bohonak
A.J.
Jenkins
D.G.
2003
Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates
Ecol. Lett.
6
8
783
796
http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00486.x
Bohonak, A.J., & Jenkins, D.G., 2003. Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecol. Lett. 6(8), 783-796. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00486.x.
Bohonak
A.J.
Whiteman
H.H.
1999
Dispersal of the fairy shrimp Branchinecta coloradensis (Anostraca): effects of hydroperiod and salamanders
Limnol. Oceanogr.
44
3
487
493
http://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0487
Bohonak, A.J., & Whiteman, H.H., 1999. Dispersal of the fairy shrimp Branchinecta coloradensis (Anostraca): effects of hydroperiod and salamanders. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44(3), 487-493. http://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0487.
Bowler
D.E.
Benton
T.G.
2005
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics
Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc.
80
2
205
225
15921049
http://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793104006645
Bowler, D.E., & Benton, T.G., 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 80(2), 205-225. PMid:15921049. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793104006645.
Bruni
E.P.
Rusconi
O.
Broennimann
O.
Adde
A.
Jauslin
R.
Krashevska
V.
Kosakyan
A.
Châtelet
E.A.
Alcino
J.P.B.
Beyens
L.
Blandenier
Q.
Bobrov
A.
Burdman
L.
Duckert
C.
Fernández
L.
Gomes e Souza
M.B.
Heger
T.
Koenig
I.
Lahr
D.
McKeown
M.
Meisterfield
R.
Singer
D.
Voelcker
E.
Wilmhurst
J.
Wohlhauser
S.
Wilkinson
D.M.
Guisan
A.
Mitchell
E.A.
2024
Global distribution modelling of a conspicuous Gondwanian soil protist reveals latitudinal dispersal limitation and range contraction in response to climate warming
Divers. Distrib.
30
2
e13779
http://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13779
Bruni, E.P., Rusconi, O., Broennimann, O., Adde, A., Jauslin, R., Krashevska, V., Kosakyan, A., Châtelet, E.A., Alcino, J.P.B., Beyens, L., Blandenier, Q., Bobrov, A., Burdman, L., Duckert, C., Fernández, L., Gomes e Souza, M.B., Heger, T., Koenig, I., Lahr, D., McKeown, M., Meisterfield, R., Singer, D., Voelcker, E., Wilmhurst, J., Wohlhauser, S., Wilkinson, D.M., Guisan, A., & Mitchell, E.A., 2024. Global distribution modelling of a conspicuous Gondwanian soil protist reveals latitudinal dispersal limitation and range contraction in response to climate warming. Divers. Distrib. 30(2), e13779. http://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13779.
Cochak
C.
Oliveira
F.R.
Lansac-Tôha
F.M.
Meira
B.R.
Durán
C.L.G.
Vitule
J.R.S.
Velho
L.F.M.
2021
Relative contributions of disparate animal vectors to the development of freshwater ciliate communities
Hydrobiol.
848
5
1121
1135
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04518-9
Cochak, C., Oliveira, F.R., Lansac-Tôha, F.M., Meira, B.R., Durán, C.L.G., Vitule, J.R.S., & Velho, L.F.M., 2021. Relative contributions of disparate animal vectors to the development of freshwater ciliate communities. Hydrobiol. 848(5), 1121-1135. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04518-9.
Cochak
C.
Zanon
F.M.
Pineda
A.
Lansac-Tôha
F.M.
Jati
S.
Velho
L.F.M.
2024
Beta diversity of freshwater algal communities: influence of different dispersal mechanisms
Aquat. Sci.
86
2
26
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-023-01040-z
Cochak, C., Zanon, F.M., Pineda, A., Lansac-Tôha, F.M., Jati, S., & Velho, L.F.M., 2024. Beta diversity of freshwater algal communities: influence of different dispersal mechanisms. Aquat. Sci. 86(2), 26. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-023-01040-z.
Dallimore
A.
2004
The characteristics of thecamoebians of Artic thermokarst lakes, Richards Island, N.W.T
J. Foraminiferal Res.
34
4
249
257
http://doi.org/10.2113/34.4.249
Dallimore, A., 2004. The characteristics of thecamoebians of Artic thermokarst lakes, Richards Island, N.W.T. J. Foraminiferal Res. 34(4), 249-257. http://doi.org/10.2113/34.4.249.
Diniz
L.P.
Braghin
L.D.S.M.
Pinheiro
T.S.A.
Melo
P.A.M.D.C.
Bonecker
C.C.
Melo
M.D.
Júnior
2021
Environmental filter drives the taxonomic and functional β-diversity of zooplankton in tropical shallow lakes
Hydrobiol.
848
8
1881
1895
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04562-5
Diniz, L.P., Braghin, L.D.S.M., Pinheiro, T.S.A., Melo, P.A.M.D.C., Bonecker, C.C., & Melo Júnior, M.D., 2021. Environmental filter drives the taxonomic and functional β-diversity of zooplankton in tropical shallow lakes. Hydrobiol. 848(8), 1881-1895. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04562-5.
Dumont
H.J.
Negrea
S.V.
2002
Introduction to the Class Branchiopoda.
Leiden
Backhuys Publishers
Dumont, H.J., & Negrea, S.V., 2002. Introduction to the Class Branchiopoda. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Foissner
W.
Wolf
K.W.
Yashchenko
V.
Stoeck
T.
2011
Description of Leptopharynx bromelicola n. sp. and characterization of the genus Leptopharynx Mermod, 1914 (Protista, Ciliophora)
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
58
2
134
151
21366759
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00532.x
Foissner, W., Wolf, K.W., Yashchenko, V., & Stoeck, T., 2011. Description of Leptopharynx bromelicola n. sp. and characterization of the genus Leptopharynx Mermod, 1914 (Protista, Ciliophora). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 58(2), 134-151. PMid:21366759. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00532.x.
Gimenes
M.F.
Benedito
E.
Takeda
A.M.
Vismara
M.R.
2004
Availability of sedimentary organic matter for benthic fishes of the upper Paraná River floodplain
Acta Sci. Biol. Sci.
26
181
187
Gimenes, M.F., Benedito, E., Takeda, A.M., & Vismara, M.R., 2004. Availability of sedimentary organic matter for benthic fishes of the upper Paraná River floodplain. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 26, 181-187.
Godsoe
W.
Murray
R.
Plank
M.J.
2015
The effect of competitionon species’ distributions depends on coexistence, rather than scale alone
Ecography
38
11
1071
1079
http://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01134
Godsoe, W., Murray, R., & Plank, M.J., 2015. The effect of competitionon species’ distributions depends on coexistence, rather than scale alone. Ecography 38(11), 1071-1079. http://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01134.
Gomes e Souza
M.B
2008
Guia das tecamebas da bacia do rio Peruaçu, Minas Gerais: subsídio para conservação e monitoramento da bacia do Rio São Francisco
Belo Horizonte
Editora UFMG
Gomes e Souza, M.B, 2008. Guia das tecamebas da bacia do rio Peruaçu, Minas Gerais: subsídio para conservação e monitoramento da bacia do Rio São Francisco. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
Gonzalez
A.
King
A.
Robeson 2nd
M.S.
Song
S.
Shade
A.
Metcalf
J.L.
Knight
R.
2012
Characterizing microbial communities through space and time
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
23
3
431
436
22154467
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.017
Gonzalez, A., King, A., Robeson 2nd, M.S., Song, S., Shade, A., Metcalf, J.L., & Knight, R., 2012. Characterizing microbial communities through space and time. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23(3), 431-436. PMid:22154467. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.017.
Heino
J.
2013
Environmental heterogeneity, dispersal mode and co-occurrence in stream macroinvertebrates
Ecol. Evol.
3
2
344
355
23467653
http://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.470
Heino, J., 2013. Environmental heterogeneity, dispersal mode and co-occurrence in stream macroinvertebrates. Ecol. Evol. 3(2), 344-355. PMid:23467653. http://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.470.
Incagnone
G.
Marrone
F.
Naselli-Flores
L.
Barone
R.
Robba
L.
2015
How do freshwater organisms cross the “dry ocean”? A review on passive dispersal and colonization processes with a special focus on temporary ponds
Hydrobiol.
750
1
103
123
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2110-3
Incagnone, G., Marrone, F., Naselli-Flores, L., Barone, R., & Robba, L., 2015. How do freshwater organisms cross the “dry ocean”? A review on passive dispersal and colonization processes with a special focus on temporary ponds. Hydrobiol. 750(1), 103-123. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2110-3.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Velho
L.F.M.
Zimmermann-Callegari
M.C.
Bonecker
C.C.
2000
On the occurrence of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) in Brazilian inland waters. I
Fam. Arcellidae. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci.
22
2
355
363
Lansac-Tôha, F.A., Velho, L.F.M., Zimmermann-Callegari, M.C., & Bonecker, C.C., 2000. On the occurrence of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) in Brazilian inland waters. I. Fam. Arcellidae. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 22(2), 355-363.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Velho
L.F.M.
Zimmermann-Callegari
M.C.
Bonecker
C.C.
Takahashi
E.M.
2001
Occurrence of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Amoebozoa, Rhizopoda) in Brazilian continental waters. III. Family Difflugiidae. Genus Difflugia.
Acta Sci. Biol. Sci.
23
305
321
Lansac-Tôha, F.A., Velho, L.F.M., Zimmermann-Callegari, M.C., Bonecker, C.C., & Takahashi, E.M., 2001. Occurrence of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Amoebozoa, Rhizopoda) in Brazilian continental waters. III. Family Difflugiidae. Genus Difflugia. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 23, 305-321.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Zimmermann-Callegari
M.C.
Alves
G.M.
Velho
L.F.M.
Fulone
L.J.
2007
Species richness and geographic distribution of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda) in Brazilian freshwater environments
Acta Sci. Biol. Sci.
29
2
185
195
Lansac-Tôha, F.A., Zimmermann-Callegari, M.C., Alves, G.M., Velho, L.F.M., & Fulone, L.J., 2007. Species richness and geographic distribution of testate amoebae (Rhizopoda) in Brazilian freshwater environments. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 29(2), 185-195.
Leibold
M.A.
Holyoak
M.
Mouquet
N.
Amarasekare
P.
Chase
J.M.
Hoopes
M.F.
Hold
R.D.
Shurin
J.B.
Law
R.
Tilman
D.
Loreau
M.
Gonzalez
A.A.
2004
The metacommunity concept: a framework for multiscale community ecology
Ecol. Lett.
7
7
601
613
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x
Leibold, M.A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N., Amarasekare, P., Chase, J.M., Hoopes, M.F., Hold, R.D., Shurin, J.B., Law, R., Tilman, D., Loreau, M., & Gonzalez, A.A., 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multiscale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7(7), 601-613. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x.
Leturque
H.
Rousset
F.
2002
Dispersal, kin competition, and the ideal free distribution in a spatially heterogeneous population
Theor. Popul. Biol.
62
2
169
180
12167355
http://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2002.1600
Leturque, H., & Rousset, F., 2002. Dispersal, kin competition, and the ideal free distribution in a spatially heterogeneous population. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62(2), 169-180. PMid:12167355. http://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2002.1600.
Lopez
L.C.S.
Filizola
B.
Deiss
I.
Rios
R.I.
2005
Phoretic behaviour of bromeliadannelids (Dero) and ostracods (Elpidium) using frogs andlizards as dispersal vectors
Hydrobiol.
549
1
1522
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1701-4
Lopez, L.C.S., Filizola, B., Deiss, I., & Rios, R.I., 2005. Phoretic behaviour of bromeliadannelids (Dero) and ostracods (Elpidium) using frogs andlizards as dispersal vectors. Hydrobiol. 549(1), 1522. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1701-4.
Ndayishimiye
J.C.
Mazei
Y.
Babeshko
K.
Tsyganov
A.N.
Bobrov
A.
Mazei
N.
Smirnov
A.
Ren
K.
Abdullah
M.
Chen
H.
Wang
W.
Saldev
D.
Ivanovskii
A.
Nyirabuhoro
P.
Yang
J.
2023
Stochastic and deterministic processes shaping the testate amoeba communities across different biotopes of urban parks in Moscow and Xiamen cities
Urban Ecosyst.
26
617
628
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01306-8
Ndayishimiye, J.C., Mazei, Y., Babeshko, K., Tsyganov, A.N., Bobrov, A., Mazei, N., Smirnov, A., Ren, K., Abdullah, M., Chen, H., Wang, W., Saldev, D., Ivanovskii, A., Nyirabuhoro, P., & Yang, J., 2023. Stochastic and deterministic processes shaping the testate amoeba communities across different biotopes of urban parks in Moscow and Xiamen cities. Urban Ecosyst. 26, 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01306-8.
Ndayishimiye
J.C.
Nyirabuhoro
P.
Gao
X.
Chen
H.
Wang
W.
Mazei
Y.
Yang
J.
2024
Community responses of testate amoebae (Arcellinida and Euglyphida) to ecological disturbance explained by contrasting assembly mechanisms in two subtropical reservoirs
Sci. Total Environ.
953
176058
39241884
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176058
Ndayishimiye, J.C., Nyirabuhoro, P., Gao, X., Chen, H., Wang, W., Mazei, Y., & Yang, J., 2024. Community responses of testate amoebae (Arcellinida and Euglyphida) to ecological disturbance explained by contrasting assembly mechanisms in two subtropical reservoirs. Sci. Total Environ. 953, 176058. PMid:39241884. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176058.
Negreiros
O.P.
Segovia
B.T.
Lansac-Tôha
F.M.
Meira
B.R.
Buosi
P.R.B.
Cabral
A.F.
Silva
H.S.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Velho
L.F.M.
2017
Structure and dynamic of planktonic ciliate community in a large Neotropical river: the relevance of the pluviosity and tributaries in the biodiversity maintenance
Acta Limnol. Bras.
29
e101
http://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x10816
Negreiros, O.P., Segovia, B.T., Lansac-Tôha, F.M., Meira, B.R., Buosi, P.R.B., Cabral, A.F., Silva, H.S., Lansac-Tôha, F.A., & Velho, L.F.M., 2017. Structure and dynamic of planktonic ciliate community in a large Neotropical river: the relevance of the pluviosity and tributaries in the biodiversity maintenance. Acta Limnol. Bras. 29, e101. http://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x10816.
Oksanen
J.
Blanchet
F.G.
Kindt
R.
Legendre
P.
Minchin
P.R.
O’hara
R.B.
Oksanen
M.J.
2013
Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version 2
online
Retrieved in 2024, March 13
from https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’hara, R.B., & Oksanen, M.J., 2013. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version 2 [online]. Retrieved in 2024, March 13, from https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan.
Oksanen
J.F.G.
Blanchet
M.
Friendly
R.
Kindt
P.
Legendre
D.
McGlinn
H.W.
2017
Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6-8.
online
Retrieved in 2024, March 13
from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Oksanen, J.F.G., Blanchet, M., Friendly, R., Kindt, P., Legendre, D., & McGlinn, H.W., 2017. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.6-8. [online]. Retrieved in 2024, March 13, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Oliveira
F.R.
Lansac-Tôha
F.M.
Meira
B.R.
Segovia
B.T.
Cochak
C.
Velho
L.F.M.
2019
Effects of the exotic rotifer Kellicottia bostoniensis (Rousselet, 1908) on the microbial food web components
Aquat. Ecol.
53
4
581
594
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-019-09710-7
Oliveira, F.R., Lansac-Tôha, F.M., Meira, B.R., Segovia, B.T., Cochak, C., & Velho, L.F.M., 2019. Effects of the exotic rotifer Kellicottia bostoniensis (Rousselet, 1908) on the microbial food web components. Aquat. Ecol. 53(4), 581-594. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-019-09710-7.
Padial
A.A.
Ceschin
F.
Declerck
S.A.J.
Meester
L.
Bonecker
C.C.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Rodrigues
L.
Rodrigues
L.C.
Train
S.
Velho
L.F.M.
Bini
L.M.
2014
Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure
PLoS One
9
10
e111227
25340577
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111227
Padial, A.A., Ceschin, F., Declerck, S.A.J., Meester, L., Bonecker, C.C., Lansac-Tôha, F.A., Rodrigues, L., Rodrigues, L.C., Train, S., Velho, L.F.M., & Bini, L.M., 2014. Dispersal ability determines the role of environmental, spatial and temporal drivers of metacommunity structure. PLoS One 9(10), e111227. PMid:25340577. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111227.
Parry
V.
Kiemel
K.
Pawlak
J.
Eccard
J.
Tiedemann
R.
Weithoff
G.
2024
Drivers of zooplankton dispersal in a pond metacommunity
Hydrobiol.
851
12
2875
2893
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05232-4
Parry, V., Kiemel, K., Pawlak, J., Eccard, J., Tiedemann, R., & Weithoff, G., 2024. Drivers of zooplankton dispersal in a pond metacommunity. Hydrobiol. 851(12), 2875-2893. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05232-4.
Parsons
W.M.
Schlichting
M.E.
Stewart
K.W.
1966
Inflighttransport of Algae and Protozoa by selected Cklonata
Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.
85
4
520
527
http://doi.org/10.2307/3224476
Parsons, W.M., Schlichting, M.E., & Stewart, K.W., 1966. Inflighttransport of Algae and Protozoa by selected Cklonata. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 85(4), 520-527. http://doi.org/10.2307/3224476.
Pilatti
M.C.
Medeiros
G.
Padial
A.A.
Amaral
M.W.W.
Guicho
R.
Bueno
N.C.
2024
Main predictors of phytoplankton occurrence in lotic ecosystems
Acta Limnol. Bras.
36
e9
http://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x6223
Pilatti, M.C., Medeiros, G., Padial, A.A., Amaral, M.W.W., Guicho, R., & Bueno, N.C., 2024. Main predictors of phytoplankton occurrence in lotic ecosystems. Acta Limnol. Bras. 36, e9. http://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x6223.
R Core Team
2024
The R Project for Statistical Computing
online
Retrieved in 2024, March 13
from https://www.R-project.org/
R Core Team, 2024. The R Project for Statistical Computing [online]. Retrieved in 2024, March 13, from https://www.R-project.org/.
Rundle
S.D.
Bilton
D.T.
Foggo
A.
2007
By wind, wings or water: body size, dispersal and range size in aquatic invertebrates.
Hildrew
A.G.
Raffaelli
D.G.
Edmonds-Brown
R.
Body size: the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems.
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
186
209
http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611223.011
Rundle, S.D., Bilton, D.T., & Foggo, A., 2007. By wind, wings or water: body size, dispersal and range size in aquatic invertebrates. In: Hildrew, A.G., Raffaelli, D.G., & Edmonds-Brown, R., eds. Body size: the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 186-209. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611223.011.
Russo
S.E.
Portnoy
S.
Augspurger
C.K.
2006
Incorporating animal behaviour into seed dispersal models: implications for seed shadows
Ecology
87
12
3160
3174
17249240
http://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[3160:IABISD]2.0.CO;2
Russo, S.E., Portnoy, S., & Augspurger, C.K., 2006. Incorporating animal behaviour into seed dispersal models: implications for seed shadows. Ecology 87(12), 3160-3174. PMid:17249240. http://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[3160:IABISD]2.0.CO;2.
Sherr
E.B.
Sherr
B.F.
1993
Preservation and storage of samples for enumeration of heterotrophic protists.
Current Kemp
P.
Sherr
B.
Sherr
E.
Cole
J.
Methods in aquatic microbial ecology.
New York
Lewis Publ.
207
212
Sherr, E.B., & Sherr, B.F., 1993. Preservation and storage of samples for enumeration of heterotrophic protists. In: Current Kemp, P., Sherr, B., Sherr, E., & Cole, J., eds. Methods in aquatic microbial ecology. New York: Lewis Publ., 207-212.
Smith
H.G.
Bobrov
A.
Lara
E.
2008
Diversity and biogeography of testate amoebae
Biodivers. Conserv.
2
2
329
343
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9260-9
Smith, H.G., Bobrov, A., & Lara, E., 2008. Diversity and biogeography of testate amoebae. Biodivers. Conserv. 2(2), 329-343. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9260-9.
Van Damme
K.
Sinev
A.Y.
2013
Tropical Amphi-Pacific disjunctions in the Cladocera (Crustacea: branchiopoda)
J. Limnol.
72
s2
209
244
http://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2013.s2.e11
Van Damme, K., & Sinev, A.Y., 2013. Tropical Amphi-Pacific disjunctions in the Cladocera (Crustacea: branchiopoda). J. Limnol. 72(s2), 209-244. http://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2013.s2.e11.
Vanschoenwinkel
B.
Gielen
S.
Vandewaerde
H.
Seaman
M.
Brendonck
L.
2008
Relative importance of different dispersal vectors for small aquatic invertebrates in a rock pool metacommunity
Ecography
31
5
567
577
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05442.x
Vanschoenwinkel, B., Gielen, S., Vandewaerde, H., Seaman, M., & Brendonck, L., 2008. Relative importance of different dispersal vectors for small aquatic invertebrates in a rock pool metacommunity. Ecography 31(5), 567-577. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05442.x.
Velho
L.F.M.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Bini
L.M.
1999
Spatial and temporal variation in densities of testate amoebae in the plankton of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil
Hydrobiol.
411
103
113
http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003889331767
Velho, L.F.M., Lansac-Tôha, F.A., & Bini, L.M., 1999. Spatial and temporal variation in densities of testate amoebae in the plankton of the Upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Hydrobiol. 411, 103-113. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003889331767.
Velho
L.F.M.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
Bini
L.M.
2003
Influence of environmental heterogeneity on the structure of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) assemblages in the plankton of the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil
Int. Rev. Hydrobiol.
88
2
154
166
http://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200390011
Velho, L.F.M., Lansac-Tôha, F.A., & Bini, L.M., 2003. Influence of environmental heterogeneity on the structure of testate amoebae (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) assemblages in the plankton of the upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 88(2), 154-166. http://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200390011.
Velho
L.F.M.
Lansac-Tôha
F.M.
Buosi
P.R.B.
Meira
B.R.
Cabral
A.F.
Lansac-Tôha
F.A.
2013
Structure of planktonic ciliates community (Protist, Ciliophora) from an urban lake of southern Brazil
Acta Sci. Biol. Sci.
35
4
531
539
http://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v35i4.18579
Velho, L.F.M., Lansac-Tôha, F.M., Buosi, P.R.B., Meira, B.R., Cabral, A.F., & Lansac-Tôha, F.A., 2013. Structure of planktonic ciliates community (Protist, Ciliophora) from an urban lake of southern Brazil. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 35(4), 531-539. http://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v35i4.18579.
Wang
W.
Ren
K.
Chen
H.
Gao
X.
Rønn
R.
Yang
J.
2020
Seven-year dynamics of testate amoeba communities driven more by stochastic than deterministic processes in two subtropical reservoirs
Water Res.
185
116232
32750568
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116232
Wang, W., Ren, K., Chen, H., Gao, X., Rønn, R., & Yang, J., 2020. Seven-year dynamics of testate amoeba communities driven more by stochastic than deterministic processes in two subtropical reservoirs. Water Res. 185, 116232. PMid:32750568. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116232.
Wang
Z.
Xu
G.
Yang
Z.
Xu
H.
2016
An approach to determining homogeneity of bodysize spectrum of biofilm-dwelling ciliates for colonization surveys
Ecology
61
865
870
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.039
Wang, Z., Xu, G., Yang, Z., & Xu, H., 2016. An approach to determining homogeneity of bodysize spectrum of biofilm-dwelling ciliates for colonization surveys. Ecology 61, 865-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.039.
Wanner
M.
Elmer
M.
Sommer
M.
Funk
R.
Puppe
D.
2015
Testate amoebae colonizing a newly exposed land surface are of airborne origin
Ecol. Indic.
48
55
62
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.037
Wanner, M., Elmer, M., Sommer, M., Funk, R., & Puppe, D., 2015. Testate amoebae colonizing a newly exposed land surface are of airborne origin. Ecol. Indic. 48, 55-62. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.037.
Weisse
T.
2008
Distribution and diversity of aquatic protists: an evolutionary and ecological perspective
Biodivers. Conserv.
17
2
243
259
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9249-4
Weisse, T., 2008. Distribution and diversity of aquatic protists: an evolutionary and ecological perspective. Biodivers. Conserv. 17(2), 243-259. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9249-4.
Weisse
T.
2024
Thermal response of freshwater ciliates: can they survive at elevated lake temperatures?
Freshw. Biol.
69
9
1245
1260
http://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14302
Weisse, T., 2024. Thermal response of freshwater ciliates: can they survive at elevated lake temperatures? Freshw. Biol. 69(9), 1245-1260. http://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.14302.
Wickham
H.
2016
Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis.
New York
Springer
2nd
http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
Wickham, H., 2016. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer, 2nd ed. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4.
Wickham
H.
Averick
M.
Bryan
J.
Chang
W.
McGowan
L.D.
François
R.
Grolemund
G.
Hayes
A.
Henry
L.
Hester
J.
Kuhn
M.
Pedersen
T.L.
Miller
E.
Bache
S.M.
Müller
K.
Ooms
J.
Robinson
D.
Seidel
D.P.
Spinu
V.
Takahashi
K.
Vaughan
D.
Wilke
C.
Woo
K.
Yutani
H.
2019
Welcome to the tidyverse
J. Open Source Softw.
43
43
1686
http://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L.D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T.L., Miller, E., Bache, S.M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D.P., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., & Yutani, H., 2019. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 43(43), 1686. http://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686.
Zagumyonnaya
O.N.
Philippov
D.A.
Zagumyonnyi
D.G.
Komarov
A.A.
Tsyganov
A.N.
Tikhonenkov
D.V.
2023
Changes in testate amoeba assemblages in a series of different types of aquatic and terrestrial habitats of wetland and forest ecosystems
Biol. Bull.
50
8
1719
1737
http://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359023080332
Zagumyonnaya, O.N., Philippov, D.A., Zagumyonnyi, D.G., Komarov, A.A., Tsyganov, A.N., & Tikhonenkov, D.V., 2023. Changes in testate amoeba assemblages in a series of different types of aquatic and terrestrial habitats of wetland and forest ecosystems. Biol. Bull. 50(8), 1719-1737. http://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359023080332.
Zhang
W.H.
Xu
H.
Jiang
Y.
Zhu
M.
Al-Hasheid
K.A.
2012
Colonization dynamics in trophic-functional structure of periphytic protist communities in coastal waters
Mar. Biol.
159
4
735
748
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1850-0
Zhang, W.H., Xu, H., Jiang, Y., Zhu, M., & Al-Hasheid, K.A., 2012. Colonization dynamics in trophic-functional structure of periphytic protist communities in coastal waters. Mar. Biol. 159(4), 735-748. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1850-0.
Zhang
W.H.
Xu
H.
Jiang
Y.
Zhu
M.
Al-Hasheid
K.A.
2013
Colonization dynamics of periphytic ciliate communities on an artificial substratum in coastal waters of the Yellow Sea, Northern China
J. Mar. Biology (Basel)
93
57
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315412000744
Zhang, W.H., Xu, H., Jiang, Y., Zhu, M., & Al-Hasheid, K.A., 2013. Colonization dynamics of periphytic ciliate communities on an artificial substratum in coastal waters of the Yellow Sea, Northern China. J. Mar. Biology (Basel) 93, 57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315412000744.
Zhong
X.
Xu
G.
Xu
H.
2017
An approach to analysis of colonization dynamics in community functioning of protozoa for bioassessment of marine pollution
Ecol. Indic.
78
526
530
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.050
Zhong, X., Xu, G., & Xu, H., 2017. An approach to analysis of colonization dynamics in community functioning of protozoa for bioassessment of marine pollution. Ecol. Indic. 78, 526-530. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.050.
Autoria
Matheus Henrique de Oliveira de Matos **e-mail: matheushematos@gmail.com
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas – FACAB, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso – UNEMAT, Av. São João, s/n, CEP 78200-000, Cáceres, MT, BrasilUniversidade do Estado de Mato GrossoBrasilCáceres, MT, BrasilDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas – FACAB, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso – UNEMAT, Av. São João, s/n, CEP 78200-000, Cáceres, MT, Brasil
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente – DEBIO, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas – ICEB, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto – UFOP, R. Diogo de Vasconcelos, 122, CEP 35402-136, Ouro Preto, MG, BrasilUniversidade Federal de Ouro PretoBrasilOuro Preto, MG, BrasilDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente – DEBIO, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas – ICEB, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto – UFOP, R. Diogo de Vasconcelos, 122, CEP 35402-136, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, BrasilUniversidade Estadual de MaringáBrasilMaringá, PR, BrasilNúcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e Aquicultura – NUPÉLIA, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquáticos Continentais – PEA, Universidade Estadual de Maringá – UEM, Av. Colombo, 5790, CEP 87020-900, Maringá, PR, Brasil
Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas – FACAB, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso – UNEMAT, Av. São João, s/n, CEP 78200-000, Cáceres, MT, BrasilUniversidade do Estado de Mato GrossoBrasilCáceres, MT, BrasilDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas – FACAB, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso – UNEMAT, Av. São João, s/n, CEP 78200-000, Cáceres, MT, Brasil
Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente – DEBIO, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas – ICEB, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto – UFOP, R. Diogo de Vasconcelos, 122, CEP 35402-136, Ouro Preto, MG, BrasilUniversidade Federal de Ouro PretoBrasilOuro Preto, MG, BrasilDepartamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente – DEBIO, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas – ICEB, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto – UFOP, R. Diogo de Vasconcelos, 122, CEP 35402-136, Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
Figure 3
Rarefaction curve of estimated richness of testate amoebae species containing all treatments as a function of sampling time. Gray= Wind, Orange= Wind + Odonata, Purple= Wind + Amphibian, Yellow= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
Figure 4
Variation of the richness of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment, where the central line denotes the mean values. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata. The bars represent, respectively, the smallest and largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below the percentage limits and the points indicate outliers in treatments.
Figure 5
Variation of the abundance of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment, where the central line denotes the mean values. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata. The bars represent, respectively, the smallest and largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below the percentage limits and the points indicate outliers in treatments. Abundance data were logarithmized.
Figure 6
Sorting by the Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) method based on the composition of the Testate amoebae community between different times and treatments. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
Table 2
Two-Way Analysis of Variance (Two-Way ANOVA) for differences in species richness between treatments, at each time point. Variation in the richness of the Testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment.
Table 3
Two-Way Analysis of Variance (Two-Way ANOVA) for differences in species abundance between treatments, at each time point. Variation of the abundance of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment.
Table 4
Results of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 999 permutations using the attributes of the testate amoebae community in relation to the times.
Table 5
Results of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 999 permutations using the attributes of the testate amoebae community in relation to the treatments.
imageFigure 1
Schematic model of experimental design. W = Wind; W + A = Wind + Amphibian; W +A + O =Wind, Amphibian and Odonata; W + O = Wind + Odonata.
open_in_new
imageFigure 2
Disposition of the microcosms in a random way, being covered by a tent to avoid dilution and homogenization of the samples by possible rains.
open_in_new
imageFigure 3
Rarefaction curve of estimated richness of testate amoebae species containing all treatments as a function of sampling time. Gray= Wind, Orange= Wind + Odonata, Purple= Wind + Amphibian, Yellow= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
open_in_new
imageFigure 4
Variation of the richness of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment, where the central line denotes the mean values. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata. The bars represent, respectively, the smallest and largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below the percentage limits and the points indicate outliers in treatments.
open_in_new
imageFigure 5
Variation of the abundance of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment, where the central line denotes the mean values. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata. The bars represent, respectively, the smallest and largest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range below the percentage limits and the points indicate outliers in treatments. Abundance data were logarithmized.
open_in_new
imageFigure 6
Sorting by the Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) method based on the composition of the Testate amoebae community between different times and treatments. W= Wind, W+O= Wind + Odonata, W+A= Wind + Amphibian, W+A+O= Wind, Amphibian and Odonata.
open_in_new
table_chartTable 1
List of testate amoebae species found in each treatment during the experiments.
TREATMENTS
Family
Species
W
W+ O
W+A
W+A+O
Difflugidae
Netzelia gramen
*
*
*
*
Difflugia minuta
*
*
*
*
Difflugia sp.
*
*
*
*
Centropyxidae
Centropyxis ecornis
*
*
*
*
Centropyxis cassis
*
*
*
*
Centropyxis platysoma
*
*
*
*
Centropyxis minuta
*
*
*
*
Cyclopyxis sp.
*
*
*
*
Euglyphidae
Euglypha polylepis
*
*
*
Euglypha acantophora
*
*
*
Trinematidae
Trinema lineare
*
*
*
*
Trinema enchelys
*
*
*
*
Sphenoderidae
Sphenoderia australis chardezi
*
table_chartTable 2
Two-Way Analysis of Variance (Two-Way ANOVA) for differences in species richness between treatments, at each time point. Variation in the richness of the Testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment.
Two-way ANOVA
RICHNESS
Df
SS
MS
F value
P
Treatments
3
36.01
12.01
2.351
0.078
Time
6
726.3
121.06
23.69
<0.001
Treatments × Time
18
234.7
13.04
2.552
0.002
Residuals
81
413.9
5.11
table_chartTable 3
Two-Way Analysis of Variance (Two-Way ANOVA) for differences in species abundance between treatments, at each time point. Variation of the abundance of the testate amoebae community for each time of the experiment.
Two-way ANOVA
ABUNDANCE
Df
SS
MS
F value
Pr(>F)
Treatments
3
6632
2211
2.833
0.043
Time
6
161742
26957
34.542
<0.001
Treatments ×Time
18
71260
3959
5.073
<0.001
Residuals
79
61653
780
table_chartTable 4
Results of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 999 permutations using the attributes of the testate amoebae community in relation to the times.
PERMANOVA BETWEEN TIMES
TREATMENTS
Times
W
W+O
W+A
W+A+O
F
p
F
p
F
p
F
p
T19-T26
0.1679
0.427
0.1966
0.347
0.1524
0.464
0.1549
0.364
T19-T33
0.1482
0.517
0.1545
0.417
0.1294
0.635
0.2233
0.052
T26-T33
0.1402
0.551
0.0680
0.790
0.1282
0.577
0.207
0.640
table_chartTable 5
Results of the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) performed with 999 permutations using the attributes of the testate amoebae community in relation to the treatments.