aa
Acta Amazonica
Acta Amaz.
0044-5967
1809-4392
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
RESUMO
Embora existam diversos estudos em crânios de peixes-boi amazônicos (Trichechus inunguis) a fim de melhor compreender a anatomia, fisiologia e comportamento desses animais, análises do cérebro tem sido negligenciadas. Tipicamente, em estudos osteológicos, o cérebro é descartado para preservar a integridade do crânio. Um dos principais motivos para essa negligência com o cérebro é a falta de protocolos adequados de dissecação que permitam a extração do cérebro intacto enquanto preserva-se a integridade do crânio. Neste estudo, apresentamos um protocolo simples, passo a passo, para um procedimento de extração e fixação do cérebro em filhotes de peixe-boi, garantindo a preservação da estrutura do crânio ao máximo possível para estudos futuros.. O protocolo é baseado em uma incisão na parte posterior do crânio, estendendo-se lateralmente em direção ao osso parietal até alcançar o osso frontal, seguido pela remoção da porção superior da calota craniana para extrair o cérebro. Ao final do procedimento, a porção removida pode ser reconstituída de forma a manter a estrutura completa do crânio. O protocolo também oferece adaptações para simplificar a metodologia de acordo com a realidade de locais com pouca estrutura laboratorial, permitindo a preservação de tecidos raros com recursos limitados e/ou em áreas de difícil acesso. A metodologia proposta permite a máxima utilização do animal coletado, o que não apenas está em conformidade com considerações éticas e práticas, mas também torna o material disponível para uma descrição detalhada dos cérebros dos peixes-boi e, consequentemente, a melhor compreensão da neuroanatomia de mamíferos aquáticos em geral.
INTRODUCTION
The Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis Natterer, 1883) belongs to the Sirenia order and is endemic to the Amazon Basin in South America (Rosas 1994; Amaral et al. 2023). It is an herbivorous, fully aquatic mammal and, uniquely, the only sirenian that inhabits exclusively freshwater environments. Despite being the smallest member of its group, calves are born weighing 10-15 kg and measuring 85-105 cm and can grow up to 2.75 meters long and weigh as much as 450 kilograms (Best 1983; Best 1984; Amaral et al. 2010).
The skull is one of the most studied structures in the Amazonian manatee. Analyses of its components, such as the tympanic bulla and the occipital condyles, have helped to shed light on ecological, behavioral, and morphological issues (Domning 1978; Domning and Hayek 1986; Castelblanco-Martínez et al. 2014; Barros et al. 2017; Valdevino et al. 2021). Additionally, cranial endocasts have been widely used as a tool in neuroanatomy to provide information about the brain anatomy of diverse fossil taxa, including sirenians (O’Shea and Reep 1990; Macrini 2023). Also, the nervous system in manatees has several peculiarities that are of great interest to researchers, particularly from evolutionary-developmental biology and comparative neuroanatomical perspectives (O’Shea and Reep 1990; Popov and Supin 1990; Kelava et al. 2013; Charvet et al. 2016). Manatees are known for their distinctive smooth cerebral cortex and thick gray matter, which may be of relevance to better understand the mechanism that generates cortical gyrification (Mota and Herculano-Houzel 2015). They are also noted for their small brain-to-body size ratio and low encephalization quotients, which have been the subject of discussions regarding their cognitive abilities (O’Shea and Reep 1990; Reep and Bonde 2006). In this sense, studying the brain morphology of manatees is not only of interest to address the structure and function of their unique neuroanatomical features, but also provide valuable data to broaden comparative studies of mammalian brains in general.
However, despite their considerable potential, studies focused on the nervous system of manatees are notably sparse. Published neuroanatomical descriptions of the West Indian manatee (Trichecus manatus, Linnaeus, 1758) (Reep and O’Shea 1990; Marshall and Reep 1995) are decades old and thus did not incorporate modern techniques not available at that time. Furthermore, detailed information regarding the dissection and fixation procedures used in these studies is no longer accessible, hindering further analysis. For the Amazonian manatee specifically, to the best of our knowledge, there are no published detailed descriptions of its brain anatomy. This likely results from the logistic challenges associated with collecting the brains of aquatic mammals, especially in the challenging climatic and logistic conditions of the Amazon, combined with a lack of scientific funding for studying the neuroanatomy of these animals in South America.
Another factor that contributes to the scarcity of neuroanatomical studies of manatees is the invasive nature of the usual approaches for brain extraction, which typically damage the skull, making it unsuitable for future morphological studies. There is thus a trade-off between extracting the intact brain and preserving the integrity of the brain case. As a result, and given the usual lack of the necessary materials and protocols, in most cases, the brain is discarded to preserve the bone structure for osteological investigations. A methodology for obtaining material that simultaneously enables both osteological and neuroanatomical research would therefore be highly valuable.
To address this challenge, we have developed and proposed in here a simple and cost-effective protocol to remove the brain from manatee calves while preserving the main components of the skull. It includes a detailed description of a removal and fixation procedure compatible with non-invasive approaches, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as histologically invasive approaches, such as immunohistochemistry (Herculano-Houzel and Lent 2005). Our main objective was to pave the way for expanding the diversity of materials deposited in anatomical collections for future research on manatee brains and to maximize the utilization of collected specimens, enabling investigations through diverse modern neuroanatomical methodologies.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We dissected five Amazonian manatee calves from the Aquatic Mammals Laboratory at the National Institute of Amazonian Research (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - INPA), Manaus, Brazil. This research facility serves as a hub for receiving, rehabilitating, and facilitating scientific studies of endangered orphaned animals. The procedures were authorized by the Scientific Breeding Facility of Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA) under process # 21105.004653/1984-60. The skulls were obtained from animals that did not survive the rehabilitation process and were collected during necropsy procedures. The study was conducted under the aegis of the recently established ‘Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade’ (neurobiodiversidade.org), created specifically to enable the collection and analysis of aquatic mammal brains in Brazil.
The age of the calves ranged from 0.5 to 1 year. Their sex, body size, and weight are informed in Table 1. Two whole individuals were frozen immediately after death and kept in a freezer for no more than three months before the procedure, while the other three had only the skull cleaned (with no skin and muscles) and placed in formalin immediately after death for at least 24 hours before dissection (Table 1). For brain extraction, we developed a protocol based on prior examinations of the cranial anatomy and position of the brain within the skull of the Amazonian manatee, using the aquatic mammal collection at INPA. Our goal was to establish a cutting plan that would enable the extraction of the whole brain while preserving the integrity of the skull to the greatest extent possible. To carry it out, the following tools are required: scalpel, microsurgery scissors, dental forceps pliers, hacksaw blade, spatula, metal spoon, tweezers, and epidural needles (Figure 1). The following reagents are required for the fixation and storage steps: 10% formalin or 4% formaldehyde (PFA), phosphate buffer, sodium azide, and deionized water (see composition in the Supplementary Material, Tables S1, S2, S3, S4). All the reagents and equipment must be made available beforehand. In institutions that receive stranded manatees and manatee deaths are deemed likely, it is recommended that a staff veterinarian or resident researcher be trained in the procedure.
Table 1
Information about the specimens of Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) used in this study. NA = Not available information.
Animal identification
Sex
Standard length* (cm)
Body weight (kg)
Pb #291
Male
84
10
Pb #293
Male
83
11
Pb #294
Male
92
14
Frozen head 1
NA
NA
NA
Frozen head 2
NA
NA
NA
*Standard length = length in straight line from the tip of its snout to the base of its tail.
Figure 1
Dissection tools used in the process of brain removal of Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) calves.
The anatomical nomenclature of bone structures follows Domning and Hayek (1986), and Hoson et al. (2009) for suture terminology. The protocol described in here can be applied to Amazonian manatees of any developmental stage but is particularly recommended for the extraction of the brains of calves, which are more susceptible to damage than those of adults.
RESULTS
The brains of the two individuals that were frozen postmortem were apparently well preserved externally but not internally, and disintegrated during the removal process. Therefore the protocol described below is based on the dissection of the three individuals that had their skulls cleaned and immediately immersed in formalin after death.
Dissection protocol
1 - Separate the head from the rest of the body using a scalpel or sharp dissecting knife through the junction between the occipital condyle and the first cervical vertebra (Figure 2a,b).
Figure 2
Line of incision (dashed line) behind the occipital condyle to separate the head from the body of Amazonian manatees, showing the position of the brain inside the skull in lateral (A) and dorsal (B) view; C - Sketch showing the removal of skin and muscles from the head to allow the visualization of the skull bones. Illustrations by Gabriel Melo-Santos.
2 - Remove the skin and muscles from the head for a clear visualization of the frontal, parietal, and occipital bones using the tweezers, scalpel and surgical spatula (Figure 2c, 3). As the cranial sutures are not totally closed in calves (Figure 3c), the brain can be seen through the bones. The removal of the brain immediately after death is not indicated in the case of calves, as their brains are exceedingly fragile and may not withstand the forces applied during removal.
Figure 3
Delimitation of the cutting area (dashed line) of the head of Amazonian manatees in lateral (A), dorsal (B, D), and posterior (C) view. The supraoccipital-exoccipital synchondrosis is the ossification area between the supraoccipital bone and exoccipital bones shown in the red dotted line. The syringe in (C) indicates the injection point for fixative into the brain through the foramen magnum. The spatula in (D) indicates the insertion movement to release the brain from the skull after fixation. Once brain extraction is complete, the skullcap can be returned to its original position, maintaining the complete structure of the skull. Illustrations by Gabriel Melo-Santos.
3 - After the removal of the skin and muscles, inject fixative into the most internal regions of the brain through the foramen magnum and nasal bone openings using an epidural needle. This will aid in the fixation of the inner parts of the brain (Figure 3c) as the fixative does not reach all regions of the tissue at the same rate (Gage et al. 2012; Latini et al. 2015; Loomis 2016). Then immerse the whole skull in 4% paraformaldehyde or 4% formalin for at least 24 hours before initiating the brain dissection process, thus avoiding the potential leakage of sensitive structures, such as the cerebellum, through the foramen magnum during the subsequent skull-cutting process. Use a volume of fixative 10 to 20 times greater than the volume of the skull being preserved, covering the whole structure, as a low liquid volume often results in poor fixation (Everitt and Gross 2006; Loomis 2016).
The status of the fixation process can be assessed by observing the color of the brain tissue. Fresh tissue is soft, rich in blood, and exhibits a reddish appearance. Upon fixation, the tissue becomes harder and takes on a slightly pale brownish hue (Figure 4). Additionally, the consistency of the brain tissue can be inspected by gently palpating it with the fingers. Unsuccessful fixation will result in a pinkish color due to the presence of blood. If the brain does not achieve the consistency and color typical of fixed material after 24 hours, the fixative needs to be replaced.
Figure 4
Brain of an Amazonian manatee calf in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views after its removal from the skull. The right hemisphere in the dorsal view still conserves the meninges. Abbreviations: bs: brainstem; cb: cerebellum; cc: cerebral cortex; rh: right hemisphere; lh: left hemisphere. Scale bar = 1cm.
4 - To separate the top of the skull, use a hacksaw blade and start the cut in the posterior part of the skull, at the level of the supraoccipital-exoccipital synchondrosis, which is not yet fused in calves (Figure 3c). Then continue on both sides towards the parietal bone until the frontal bone, after the coronal suture. Laterally, the cut plane goes along the suture between the parietal and squamosal bones (Figure 3a), where the bone is less dense, reducing the risk of accidental damage from applying too much pressure to harder skull regions. The supraoccipital-exoccipital synchondrosis, is the last region on the skull to begin the ossification process (Valdevino 2016). This cutting line also protects delicate structures like the tympanic bulla and other important bone regions.
5 - After completing the cut all around the skull, use dental forceps pliers to carefully remove the skullcap and expose the dorsal part of the brain (Figure 3d). The brain is enveloped by thin membranes called meninges, which must be removed carefully to avoid cutting into the brain during the extraction. In these animals, the meninges were strongly adhered to both the brain and the braincase, so use a blunt object without sharp tips, such as a spatula or metal spoon, to very gently and carefully separate the membrane from the brain tissue. Microsurgery scissors can also be used to cut the meninges and facilitate their separation from the skull. This precaution is necessary to avoid potential damage to the tissue while separating the brain from the skull.
6 - Keep the skull in dorsal orientation (Figure 3b) and, with the aid of the surgical spatula and metal spoon, release the rest of the brain from the skull to allow its removal without any damage to the tissue (Figure 3d). Carefully slide your fingers between the bone-brain boundary in the laterals, and also underneath the brainstem and cerebellum, and gently lift the posterior part of the brain. Be careful not to apply excessive pressure to the brain tissue.
7 - Immediately after removing the brain, place it in a container filled with PBS in sodium azide (PbAz), and sealed with a hermetic cover, for storage until analysis. Alternatively, a 30% sucrose solution at 4 °C can be used to dehydrate the tissue for cryoprotection. After dehydration, the brain sinks to the bottom and can then be stored in an antifreeze solution at -20 °C. This step is beneficial for immunohistochemical analyses, as it gives greater flexibility for conducting experiments (Corthell 2014).
8 - After the brain is removed, the skull can undergo further cleaning and preparation for inclusion in an osteological collection. If the upper part of the skull was removed with a clean cut (Figure 3d), it can be easily fitted back into place, preserving the original skull morphology for anatomical, imaging and/or histological studies.
DISCUSSION
Our dissection protocol for brain extraction in Amazonian manatees represents a novel methodology that allows for the removal of the brain in good condition while preserving the skull for a variety of modern morphological studies. It enables analyses of brain tissue using both invasive and non-invasive techniques, such as immunohistochemistry and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively.
The brain tissue is soft, delicate, and prone to degradation. It is surrounded by the meninges, which, among several other functions, provide a protective covering for the underlying neural tissue of the brain and the spinal cord (Decimo et al. 2012; Dasgupta and Jeong 2019). Based on previous necropsies in the context of the Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade, we have observed that in other aquatic mammals, such as dolphins, the meninges surrounding the brain are not as tightly attached to the brain and skull as in the Amazonian manatee calves. This observation reinforces the recommendation of immersing the head for brain removal in a bucket filled with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) or 10% formalin (preferentially PFA, if planning to perform immunohistochemistry analyses (Corthell 2014; Loomis 2016) to allow the brain to gain consistency and better withstand handling during the procedure. Further research is necessary to elucidate if this is a general species-specific feature or just related to the calf stage.
One of the main concerns when fixating neural tissue is selecting an appropriate fixative that preserves the brain tissue as closely as possible to its living state while maintaining its suitability for the intended analysis. Also, reducing the time interval between death and fixation is crucial for maintaining tissue integrity (Insausti et al. 2023). While freezing is often more practical than other preservation methods and is commonly chosen when available, our experiments revealed that, in the case of brain tissue, it caused significant degradation of the sample even before the extraction procedure was completed. The tissue loses its consistency and fails to fixate internally, resulting in the complete loss of the sample. Besides that, freezing the sample even after fixation in formalin is not a good choice since it leads to the formation of ice crystals in the brain sample and consequent damage to the tissue, rendering the organ unsuitable for further procedures (Rosene and Rhodes 1990).
The use of 4% PFA is generally considered the gold standard approach to preserve cellular morphology and antigenicity (Li et al. 2017; Konno et al. 2023). However, due to the logistical challenges involved in preparing this solution - since 4% PFA cannot be ordered as a working solution, requiring prior preparation, and must be kept cold-previous tests showed that, alternatively, the use of formalin at low concentrations (4%) as fixative also has provided satisfactory results in immunohistochemistry and neuroimaging studies.
The time required for fixation is another concern and depends on the size of the brain and the fixative used (Carter and Shieh 2015; Loomis 2016). It is crucial to ensure that the brain tissue becomes fixed enough to allow for manipulation without disintegration. However, avoiding over-fixing is also important to preserve the tissue for histological analysis, such as immunohistochemical staining (Corthell 2014). This timing must be adjusted to adapt to specific needs and circumstances. Previous studies on humans have shown that extending fixation time to 72h still allows techniques like Nissl-staining (Insausti et al. 2023). However, smaller brains, such as those of manatees, tend to overfix more quickly. Further tests are necessary to determine the appropriate fixation time for different morphological techniques.
As a post-fixation step, freezing the tissue for slicing techniques or sample storage can be an alternative option after the PFA/formalin fixation process rather than PbAz. To cryoprotect the tissue in this case, sucrose can be used to push the water molecules out of the tissue, preventing ice crystal formation and preserving the tissue available for further morphological analysis (Corthell 2014). However, for neuroimaging studies, preliminary results have demonstrated that sucrose-infiltrated brain tissue preparation may alter the water diffusion properties of the tissue (Mullins et al. 2013). This may prevent imaging methodologies such as diffusion tensor MRI, which relies on the anisotropy of the diffusion of water molecules to investigate connectivity in the brain. In this context, preserving the brain in PBS or PbAz after the fixation process is preferable. PbAz not only acts as an antimicrobial preservative (de Prisco et al. 2022) but also enhances the contrast between tissues of their nuclear spin relaxation times, resulting in more clearly defined images (Wielenga et al. 2023). Although the post-fixation time and reagents were adapted to immunohistochemistry studies mentioned here, post-fixation time for other techniques can be up to five years stored simply in paraformaldehyde/formalin (Insausti et al. 2023; Nardi et al. 2023). However, it should be noted that such prolonged exposure may lead to deformation and shrinkage of the tissue which may, for example, confound volumetric measurement studies (Su et al. 2014; de Guzman et al. 2016; Insausti et al. 2023; McKenzie et al. 2024). These effects are still under debate but must be considered when determining the appropriate post-fixation duration to ensure the integrity of morphological data in long-term storage.
In rare instances, neuroimaging studies can be performed in situ, right after the animal’s death. This allows the immediate analysis of the brain and has the advantage of investigating the organ in its correct position within the skull, with no distortions related to the brain removal and fixation (Montie et al. 2007). However, given the challenges of carcass transportation, preparing the brain for ex-situ analysis is more frequently the best choice. An alternative approach is to perform in situ brain imaging in materials that are preserved in formalin for a long time, as in the case of museums or research collections. However, for these materials, the immunohistological analysis may be unsuitable. In light of this, our approach provides researchers with the necessary time, equipment, and resources to perform comprehensive imaging, histological, and osteological analyses, yielding a wide range of valuable data for further research.
The acquisition of high-quality brain tissue, along with the preservation of the skull, is a significant advancement in the field. Both elements are crucial for comprehending the evolution of mammalian brains and the potential cognitive capacities of the species (Domning and Hayek 1986; Bauer and Reep 2022; Henaut et al. 2022), but in many cases, one must be chosen at the expense of the other. Our protocol introduces a standardized method for whole brain extraction, increasing the availability of this organ in zoological collections, and potentially minimizing methodological discrepancies among comparative anatomical descriptions. This standardization is crucial as varying protocols can affect the accuracy, reproducibility, and comparison across different neuromorphological studies (G.Vonsattel et al. 1995; Ioannidis 2011; Klapwijk et al. 2021).
We expect this work will open the door to various neuroanatomical studies on Amazonian manatees including the potential analysis of adult specimens. The extracted manatee brains can be used to produce detailed neuroanatomical descriptions, high-fidelity cortical surface reconstructions from structural MRI, white matter connectivity mapping through imaging techniques such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and precise cellular counting for the various brain regions using techniques such as the isotropic fractionator (Herculano-Houzel and Lent 2005). In terms of comparative neuroanatomy, studying Amazonian manatee brains allows for comparative analyses within the Sirenia group (Chapman 1875; Marshall and Reep 1995; Reep and O’Shea 1990; Reep et al. 1989; Sarko and Reep 2007; Bauer and Reep 2022; Macrini 2023) as well as other mammals (Manger et al. 2012), providing valuable insights into the relationship between evolutionary and neuromorphological aspects of this group.
CONCLUSIONS
This study offers the first detailed method for extracting and fixing manatee brains while preserving the skull for future morphometrical investigations. Our research addresses the scarcity of data on aquatic mammal brains, particularly in Brazil, and provides the means to increase the material available for multivariate studies aimed at advancing our understanding of manatee neuroanatomy, contributing to the broader field of mammalian neuroanatomy.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Instituto Serrapilheira and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). GCMV was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) Financing Code 001, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas - FAPEAM/POSGRAD.
REFERENCES
Amaral, R.; Marmontel, M.; De Souza, D.; De Carvalho, C.; Valdevino, G.; Guterres-Pazin, M.; et al. 2023. Advances in the knowledge of the biology and conservation of the Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis). Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 18: 125-138.
Amaral
R.
Marmontel
M.
De Souza
D.
De Carvalho
C.
Valdevino
G.
Guterres-Pazin
M.
2023
Advances in the knowledge of the biology and conservation of the Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis)
Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals
18
125
138
Amaral, R.S.; Silva, V.M.F.D.; Rosas, F.C.W. 2010. Body weight/length relationship and mass estimation using morphometric measurements in Amazonian manatees Trichechus inunguis (Mammalia: Sirenia). Marine Biodiversity Records 3: e105.
Amaral
R.S.
Silva
V.M.F.D.
Rosas
F.C.W.
2010
Body weight/length relationship and mass estimation using morphometric measurements in Amazonian manatees Trichechus inunguis (Mammalia: Sirenia)
Marine Biodiversity Records
3
e105
Barros, H.M.D.D.R.; Meirelles, A.C.O.; Luna, F.O.; Marmontel, M.; Cordeiro-Estrela, P.; Santos, N.; et al. 2017. Cranial and chromosomal geographic variation in manatees (Mammalia: Sirenia: Trichechidae) with the description of the Antillean manatee karyotype in Brazil. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 55: 73-87.
Barros
H.M.D.D.R.
Meirelles
A.C.O.
Luna
F.O.
Marmontel
M.
Cordeiro-Estrela
P.
Santos
N.
2017
Cranial and chromosomal geographic variation in manatees (Mammalia: Sirenia: Trichechidae) with the description of the Antillean manatee karyotype in Brazil
Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research
55
73
87
Bauer, G.B.; Reep, R.L. 2022. Manatee cognition in the wild: an exploration of the manatee mind and behavior through neuroanatomy, psychophysics, and field observations. Animal Cognition 25: 1161-1182.
Bauer
G.B.
Reep
R.L.
2022
Manatee cognition in the wild: an exploration of the manatee mind and behavior through neuroanatomy, psychophysics, and field observations
Animal Cognition
25
1161
1182
Best, R.C. 1983. Apparent dry-season fasting in Amazonian manatees (Mammalia: Sirenia). Biotropica 15: 61-64.
Best
R.C.
1983
Apparent dry-season fasting in Amazonian manatees (Mammalia: Sirenia)
Biotropica
15
61
64
Best, R.C. 1984. The aquatic mammals and reptiles of the Amazon. In: Sioli, H. (Ed.). The Amazon, v. 56, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, p.371-412.
Best
R.C.
1984
The aquatic mammals and reptiles of the Amazon
Sioli
H.
The Amazon
56
Springer Netherlands
Dordrecht
371
412
Carter, M.; Shieh, J. 2015. Visualizing neural structure. In: Guide to Research Techniques in Neuroscience, Elsevier, p.145-166.
Carter
M.
Shieh
J.
2015
Visualizing neural structure
Guide to Research Techniques in Neuroscience
Elsevier
145
166
Castelblanco-Martínez, D.N.; Morales-Vela, B.; Padilla-Saldívar, J.A. 2014. Using craniometrical predictors to infer body size of Antillean manatees. Mammalia 78: 109-115.
Castelblanco-Martínez
D.N.
Morales-Vela
B.
Padilla-Saldívar
J.A.
2014
Using craniometrical predictors to infer body size of Antillean manatees
Mammalia
78
109
115
Chapman, H.C. 1875. Observations on the structure of the manatee. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 27: 452-462.
Chapman
H.C.
1875
Observations on the structure of the manatee
Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia
27
452
462
Charvet, C.J.; Reep, R.L.; Finlay, B.L. 2016 Evolution of cytoarchitectural landscapes in the mammalian isocortex: Sirenians (Trichechus manatus) in comparison with other mammals. Journal of Comparative Neurology 524: 772-782.
Charvet
C.J.
Reep
R.L.
Finlay
B.L.
2016
Evolution of cytoarchitectural landscapes in the mammalian isocortex: Sirenians (Trichechus manatus) in comparison with other mammals
Journal of Comparative Neurology
524
772
782
Corthell, J.T. 2014. Perfusion and immersion fixation. In: Corthell, J.T. (Ed.). Basic Molecular Protocols in Neuroscience: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls. Academic Press, Cambridge, p.83-90.
Corthell
J.T.
2014
Perfusion and immersion fixation
Corthell
J.T.
Basic Molecular Protocols in Neuroscience: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls
Academic Press
Cambridge
83
90
Dasgupta, K.; Jeong, J. 2019. Developmental biology of the meninges. Genesis 57: e23288.
Dasgupta
K.
Jeong
J.
2019
Developmental biology of the meninges
Genesis
57
e23288
Decimo, I.; Fumagalli, G.; Berton, V.; Krampera, M.; Bifari, F. 2012. Meninges: from protective membrane to stem cell niche. American Journal of Stem Cells 1: 92-105.
Decimo
I.
Fumagalli
G.
Berton
V.
Krampera
M.
Bifari
F.
2012
Meninges: from protective membrane to stem cell niche
American Journal of Stem Cells
1
92
105
De Guzman, A. E., Wong, M. D., Gleave, J. A., & Nieman, B. J. 2016. Variations in post-perfusion immersion fixation and storage alter MRI measurements of mouse brain morphometry. Neuroimage 142: 687-695.
De Guzman
A. E.
Wong
M. D.
Gleave
J. A.
Nieman
B. J.
2016
Variations in post-perfusion immersion fixation and storage alter MRI measurements of mouse brain morphometry
Neuroimage
142
687
695
De Prisco, N.; Chemiakine, A.; Lee, W.; Botta, S.; Gennarino, V.A. 2022. Protocol to assess the effect of disease-driving variants on mouse brain morphology and primary hippocampal neurons. STAR Protocols 3: 101244.
De Prisco
N.
Chemiakine
A.
Lee
W.
Botta
S.
Gennarino
V.A.
2022
Protocol to assess the effect of disease-driving variants on mouse brain morphology and primary hippocampal neurons
STAR Protocols
3
101244
101244
Domning, D.P. 1978. The myology of the Amazonian manatee, Trichechus inunguis (Natterer) (Mammalia: Sirenia). Acta Amazonica 8: 5-81.
Domning
D.P.
1978
The myology of the Amazonian manatee, Trichechus inunguis (Natterer) (Mammalia: Sirenia)
Acta Amazonica
8
5
81
Domning, D.P.; Hayek, L.-A.C. 1986. Interspecific and intraspecific morphological variation in manatees (Sirenia: Trichechus). Marine Mammal Science 2: 87-144.
Domning
D.P.
Hayek
L.-A.C.
1986
Interspecific and intraspecific morphological variation in manatees (Sirenia: Trichechus)
Marine Mammal Science
2
87
144
Everitt, J.I.; Gross, E.A. 2006. Euthanasia and necropsy. In: Suckow, M.A.; Steven, H. Weisbroth, S.H.; Franklin, C.L. (Eds.). The Laboratory Rat, Academic Press, Cambridge , p.665-678.
Everitt
J.I.
Gross
E.A.
2006
Euthanasia and necropsy
Suckow
M.A.
Steven
S.H.
Franklin
C.L.
The Laboratory Rat
Academic Press
Cambridge
665
678
Gage, G.J.; Kipke, D.R.; Shain, W. 2012. Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents. Journal of Visualized Experiments 65: e3564.
Gage
G.J.
Kipke
D.R.
Shain
W.
2012
Whole animal perfusion fixation for rodents
Journal of Visualized Experiments
65
e3564
G. Vonsattel, J.P.; Aizawa, H.; Difiglia, M.; Mckee, A.C.; Macdonald, M.; Gusella, J.E.; et al. 1995. An improved approach to prepare human brains for research. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology 54: 42-56.
G. Vonsattel
J.P.
Aizawa
H.
Difiglia
M.
Mckee
A.C.
Macdonald
M.
Gusella
J.E.
1995
An improved approach to prepare human brains for research
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
54
42
56
Henaut, Y.; Charles, A.; Delfour, F. 2022. Cognition of the manatee: past research and future developments. Animal Cognition 25: 1049-1058.
Henaut
Y.
Charles
A.
Delfour
F.
2022
Cognition of the manatee: past research and future developments
Animal Cognition
25
1049
1058
Herculano-Houzel, S.; Lent, R. 2005. Isotropic fractionator: A simple, rapid method for the quantification of total cell and neuron numbers in the brain. The Journal of Neuroscience 25: 2518-2521.
Herculano-Houzel
S.
Lent
R.
2005
Isotropic fractionator: A simple, rapid method for the quantification of total cell and neuron numbers in the brain
The Journal of Neuroscience
25
2518
2521
Hoson, O.; Kawada, S.; Oda, S. 2009. Ossification patterns of cranial sutures in the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) (Sirenia, Trichechidae). Aquatic Mammals 35: 72-81.
Hoson
O.
Kawada
S.
Oda
S.
2009
Ossification patterns of cranial sutures in the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) (Sirenia, Trichechidae)
Aquatic Mammals
35
72
81
Insausti, R.; Insausti, A.M.; Muñoz López, M.; Medina Lorenzo, I.; Arroyo-Jiménez, M.D.M.; Marcos Rabal, M.P.; et al. 2023. Ex vivo, in situ perfusion protocol for human brain fixation compatible with microscopy, MRI techniques, and anatomical studies. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 17: 1149674.
Insausti
R.
Insausti
A.M.
Muñoz López
M.
Medina Lorenzo
I.
Arroyo-Jiménez
M.D.M.
Marcos Rabal
M.P.
2023
Ex vivo, in situ perfusion protocol for human brain fixation compatible with microscopy, MRI techniques, and anatomical studies
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
17
1149674
1149674
Ioannidis, J.P.A. 2011. Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities. Archives of General Psychiatry 68: 773-780
Ioannidis
J.P.A.
2011
Excess Significance Bias in the Literature on Brain Volume Abnormalities
Archives of General Psychiatry
68
773
780
Kelava, I.; Lewitus, E.; Huttner, W.B. 2013. The secondary loss of gyrencephaly as an example of evolutionary phenotypical reversal. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 7: 16. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2013.00016
Kelava
I.
Lewitus
E.
Huttner
W.B.
2013
The secondary loss of gyrencephaly as an example of evolutionary phenotypical reversal
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
7
16
16
10.3389/fnana.2013.00016
Klapwijk, E.T.; van den Bos, W.; Tamnes, C.K.; Raschle, N.M.; Mills, K.L. 2021. Opportunities for increased reproducibility and replicability of developmental neuroimaging. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 47: 100902.
Klapwijk
E.T.
van den Bos
W.
Tamnes
C.K.
Raschle
N.M.
Mills
K.L.
2021
Opportunities for increased reproducibility and replicability of developmental neuroimaging
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
47
100902
100902
Konno, K.; Yamasaki, M.; Miyazaki, T.; Watanabe, M. 2023. Glyoxal fixation: An approach to solve immunohistochemical problem in neuroscience research. Science Advances 9: eadf7084.
Konno
K.
Yamasaki
M.
Miyazaki
T.
Watanabe
M.
2023
Glyoxal fixation: An approach to solve immunohistochemical problem in neuroscience research
Science Advances
9
eadf7084
Latini, F.; Hjortberg, M.; Aldskogius, H.; Ryttlefors, M. 2015. The use of a cerebral perfusion and immersion-fixation process for subsequent white matter dissection. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 253: 161-169.
Latini
F.
Hjortberg
M.
Aldskogius
H.
Ryttlefors
M.
2015
The use of a cerebral perfusion and immersion-fixation process for subsequent white matter dissection
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
253
161
169
Li, Y.; Almassalha, L.M.; Chandler, J.E.; Zhou, X.; Stypula-Cyrus, Y.E.; Hujsak, K.A.; et al. 2017. The effects of chemical fixation on the cellular nanostructure. Experimental Cell Research 358: 253-259.
Li
Y.
Almassalha
L.M.
Chandler
J.E.
Zhou
X.
Stypula-Cyrus
Y.E.
Hujsak
K.A.
2017
The effects of chemical fixation on the cellular nanostructure
Experimental Cell Research
358
253
259
Loomis, C. 2016. Detailed discussion of tissue prep and formalin/formaldehyde fixation recommendations. Technical protocol. NYU Langone Medical Center, Experimental Pathology Research Laboratory. (https://med.nyu.edu/research/scientific-cores-shared-resources/sites/default/files/nyu-histocore-formalin-formaldehyde-fixation-recommendations.pdf).
Loomis
C.
2016
Detailed discussion of tissue prep and formalin/formaldehyde fixation recommendations
Technical protocol
NYU Langone Medical Center, Experimental Pathology Research Laboratory
https://med.nyu.edu/research/scientific-cores-shared-resources/sites/default/files/nyu-histocore-formalin-formaldehyde-fixation-recommendations.pdf
Macrini, T.E.; Orihuela, J. 2023. Evolution of the brain and sensory structures in Sirenia. In: Dozo, M.T.; Paulina-Carabajal, A.; Macrini, T.E.; Walsh, S. (Eds.). Paleoneurology of Amniotes. Springer, Cham, p.557-577.
Macrini
T.E.
Orihuela
J.
2023
Evolution of the brain and sensory structures in Sirenia
Dozo
M.T.
Paulina-Carabajal
A.
Macrini
T.E.
Walsh
S.
Paleoneurology of Amniotes
Springer
Cham
557
577
Manger, P.R.; Prowse, M.; Haagensen, M.; Hemingway, J. 2012. Quantitative analysis of neocortical gyrencephaly in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and six species of cetaceans: Comparison with other mammals. The Journal of Comparative Neurology 520: 2430-2439.
Manger
P.R.
Prowse
M.
Haagensen
M.
Hemingway
J.
2012
Quantitative analysis of neocortical gyrencephaly in African elephants (Loxodonta africana) and six species of cetaceans: Comparison with other mammals
The Journal of Comparative Neurology
520
2430
2439
Marshall, C.D.; Reep, R.L. 1995. Manatee cerebral cortex: Cytoarchitecture of the caudal region in Trichechus manatus latirostris. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 45: 1-18.
Marshall
C.D.
Reep
R.L.
1995
Manatee cerebral cortex: Cytoarchitecture of the caudal region in Trichechus manatus latirostris
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
45
1
18
McKenzie, A.T.; Nnadi, O.; Slagell, K.D.; Thorn, E.L.; Farrell, K.; Crary, J.F. 2024. Fluid preservation in brain banking: a review. Free Neuropathology 5: 10. doi: 10.17879/freeneuropathology-2024-5373
McKenzie
A.T.
Nnadi
O.
Slagell
K.D.
Thorn
E.L.
Farrell
K.
Crary
J.F.
2024
Fluid preservation in brain banking: a review
Free Neuropathology
5
10
10
10.17879/freeneuropathology-2024-5373
Montie, E.W.; Schneider, G.E.; Ketten, D.R.; Marino, L.; Touhey, K.E.; Hahn, M.E. 2007. Neuroanatomy of the subadult and fetal brain of the Atlantic white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus acutus) from in situ magnetic resonance images. The Anatomical Record 290: 1459-1479.
Montie
E.W.
Schneider
G.E.
Ketten
D.R.
Marino
L.
Touhey
K.E.
Hahn
M.E.
2007
Neuroanatomy of the subadult and fetal brain of the Atlantic white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus acutus) from in situ magnetic resonance images
The Anatomical Record
290
1459
1479
Mota, B.; Herculano-Houzel, S. 2015. Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons. Science 349: 74-77.
Mota
B.
Herculano-Houzel
S.
2015
Cortical folding scales universally with surface area and thickness, not number of neurons
Science
349
74
77
Mullins, R.J.; Shi, D.; Zhuo, J.; Xu, S.; Gullapalli, R.P. 2013. Magnetic resonance characteristics of sucrose-infiltrated ex-vivo brain tissue preparations. Proceedings of the ISMRM 21st Annual Meeting. (https://archive.ismrm.org/2013/2320.html).
Mullins
R.J.
Shi
D.
Zhuo
J.
Xu
S.
Gullapalli
R.P.
2013
Magnetic resonance characteristics of sucrose-infiltrated ex-vivo brain tissue preparations
Proceedings of the ISMRM 21st Annual Meeting
https://archive.ismrm.org/2013/2320.html
Nardi, L.; Schmeisser, M.J.; Schumann, S. 2023. Fixation and staining methods for macroscopical investigation of the brain. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy 17: 1200196.
Nardi
L.
Schmeisser
M.J.
Schumann
S.
2023
Fixation and staining methods for macroscopical investigation of the brain
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
17
1200196
1200196
O’Shea, T.J.; Reep, R.L. 1990. Encephalization quotients and life-history traits in the Sirenia. Journal of Mammalogy 71: 534-543.
O’Shea
T.J.
Reep
R.L.
1990
Encephalization quotients and life-history traits in the Sirenia
Journal of Mammalogy
71
534
543
Popov, V.; Supin, A. 1990. Electrophysiological studies of hearing in some cetaceans and a manatee. In: Thomas, J.A.; Kastelein, R.A. (Eds.). Sensory Abilities of Cetaceans. NATO ASI Series v.196, Springer, Boston, p.405-415.
Popov
V.
Supin
A.
1990
Electrophysiological studies of hearing in some cetaceans and a manatee
Thomas
J.A.
Kastelein
R.A.
Sensory Abilities of Cetaceans
NATO ASI Series
196
Springer
Boston
405
415
Reep, R.L.; Bonde, R.K. 2006. Brains. In: Reep, R.L.; Bonde, R.K. (Eds.). The Florida Manatee: Biology and Conservation. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, p.87-102.
Reep
R.L.
Bonde
R.K.
2006
Brains
Reep
R.L.
Bonde
R.K.
The Florida Manatee: Biology and Conservation
University Press of Florida
Gainesville
87
102
Reep, R.L.; Johnson, J.I.; Switzer, R.C.; Welker, W.I. 1989. Manatee cerebral cortex: Cytoarchitecture of the frontal region in Trichechus manatus latirostris. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 34: 365-386.
Reep
R.L.
Johnson
J.I.
Switzer
R.C.
Welker
W.I.
1989
Manatee cerebral cortex: Cytoarchitecture of the frontal region in Trichechus manatus latirostris
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
34
365
386
Reep, R.L.; O’Shea, T.J. 1990. Regional brain morphometry and lissencephaly in the Sirenia. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 35: 185-194.
Reep
R.L.
O’Shea
T.J.
1990
Regional brain morphometry and lissencephaly in the Sirenia
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
35
185
194
Rosas, F.C.W. 1994. Biology, conservation and status of the Amazonian Manatee Trichechus inunguis. Mammal Review 24: 49-59.
Rosas
F.C.W.
1994
Biology, conservation and status of the Amazonian Manatee Trichechus inunguis
Mammal Review
24
49
59
Rosene, D.L.; Rhodes, K.J. 1990. Cryoprotection and freezing methods to control ice crystal artifact in frozen sections of fixed and unfixed brain tissue. In: Conn, P.M. (Ed.). Methods in Neurosciences. v.3, Academic Press, Cambridge , p.360-385.
Rosene
D.L.
Rhodes
K.J.
1990
Cryoprotection and freezing methods to control ice crystal artifact in frozen sections of fixed and unfixed brain tissue
Conn
P.M.
Methods in Neurosciences
3
Academic Press
Cambridge
360
385
Sarko, D.K.; Reep, R.L. 2007. Somatosensory areas of manatee cerebral cortex: Histochemical characterization and functional implications. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 69: 20-36.
Sarko
D.K.
Reep
R.L.
2007
Somatosensory areas of manatee cerebral cortex: Histochemical characterization and functional implications
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
69
20
36
Su, J.-W.; Hsu, W.-C.; Tjiu, J.-W.; Chiang, C.-P.; Huang, C.-W.; Sung, K.-B. 2014. Investigation of influences of the paraformaldehyde fixation and paraffin embedding removal process on refractive indices and scattering properties of epithelial cells. Journal of Biomedical Optics 19: 075007.
Su
J.-W.
Hsu
W.-C.
Tjiu
J.-W.
Chiang
C.-P.
Huang
C.-W.
Sung
K.-B.
2014
Investigation of influences of the paraformaldehyde fixation and paraffin embedding removal process on refractive indices and scattering properties of epithelial cells
Journal of Biomedical Optics
19
075007
075007
Valdevino, G.C.M. 2016. Variações morfológicas e geográficas no sincrânio do peixe-boi da Amazônia, Trichechus inunguis (Natterer, 1883). Master´s dissertation, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brazil, 83p. (https://tede.ufam.edu.br/handle/tede/5363).
Valdevino
G.C.M.
2016
Variações morfológicas e geográficas no sincrânio do peixe-boi da Amazônia, Trichechus inunguis (Natterer, 1883)
Master
Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM)
Brazil
83
https://tede.ufam.edu.br/handle/tede/5363
Valdevino, G.D.C.M.; Silva, V.M.F.D.; Amaral, R.D.S. 2021. Using osteological measurements to estimate body length in Amazonian manatees. Acta Amazonica 51: 156-161.
Valdevino
G.D.C.M.
Silva
V.M.F.D.
Amaral
R.D.S.
2021
Using osteological measurements to estimate body length in Amazonian manatees
Acta Amazonica
51
156
161
Wielenga, V.H.; Dijkhuizen, R.M.; Van Der Toorn, A. 2023. Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging of degenerating and reorganizing white matter in post-stroke rodent brain. In: Karamyan, V.T.; Stowe, A.M. (Eds.). Neural Repair Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology book series, v.2616, Springer, New York, p.153-168.
Wielenga
V.H.
Dijkhuizen
R.M.
Van Der Toorn
A.
2023
Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging of degenerating and reorganizing white matter in post-stroke rodent brain
Karamyan
V.T.
Stowe
A.M.
Neural Repair Methods and Protocols
Methods in Molecular Biology book series
2616
Springer
New York
153
168
CITE AS:
Avelino-de-Souza, K.; Valdevino, G.C.M.; Melo-Santos, G.; Mota, B.; Da Silva, V.M.F. 2025. How to remove the brain of Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) calves preserving the skull for morphological analysis. Acta Amazonica 55: e55bc23384.
Data availability
The original datasets produced and examined during this study can be obtained, upon reasonable request, from the corresponding author [Kamilla Avelino de Souza].
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Avelino-de-Souza et al. How to remove the brain of Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) calves preserving the skull for morphological analysis
Table S1
Composition of the phosphate buffer (PB) 0.4M used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Ingredient
Total volume (L)
1
5
10
Distilled water (L)
0.5
2.5
5
Anhydrous di-potassium hydrogen phosphate [K2HPO4] (g)
56
280
560
Sodium di-hydrogen phosphate [NaH2PO4 H2O] (g)
10.6
53
106
Distilled water
adjust to 1L
adjust to 5L
adjust to 10L
Check pH to be between 7.2-7.4.
The solution can be stored at 4°C for up to 6 months.
To prepare the working solution of 0.1 M, dilute 1:4 with distilled water, i.e., 250 ml of PB 0.4 M plus 750 ml of distilled water generates 1 liter of PB 0.1 M.
To prepare the solution, the following equipment is necessary: magnetic stirrer to dissolve the components, pH-meter, precision balance, and a glass Pyrex bottle.
Table S2
Composition of the 0.1 M sodium azide (NaAz) solution used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Ingredient
Total volume (L)
1
5
10
0.1 M PB (L)
1
5
10
Sodium azide (g)
1
5
10
SAFETY NOTE: Sodium azide must be handled and prepared carefully due to its toxic and carcinogenic nature. It is crucial to avoid inhaling its dust and avoid using metal utensils during its manipulation. Safety guidelines for this substance are available at <https://www.ehs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/lab_safety_guideline_sodium_azide.pdf>.
The solution can be stored in the refrigerator or at room temperature for up to one year.
To prepare the solution, the following equipment is necessary: magnetic stirrer to dissolve the components, precision balance, and a glass Pyrex bottle.
Table S3
Composition of the 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1M PB solution used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Ingredient
Total volume (L)
1
5
10
Distilled water
0.75
3.75
7.5
PFA powder stir (g)
40
200
400
NaOH 10M
drops
drops
drops
0.4M PB (L)
0.25
1.25
2.5
PREPARATION: Heat distilled water to 60 °C, add PFA and stir. Neutralize pH with the NaOH 10M drop by drop until the solution becomes clear, then add 0.4 M PB. The output solution should equal pH = 7.2. Filter the solution using filter paper and store at -20 °C up to 1 month. If kept in the refrigerator (at 4 °C) it must be used in up to one week.
To prepare the solution, the following equipment and material is necessary: fume hood, precision balance, heated stir plate, Erlenmeyer flask (500 ml), magnetic stir bar, pH meter, filter paper, glass Pyrex bottle. The following EPIs are necessary: gloves, lab coat, mask, eye protection.
Table S4
Composition of the 30% sucrose solution that can be used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Ingredient
Total volume (L)
1
5
10
0.1 M PB (L)
1
5
10
Sucrose (kg)
0.3
1.5
3
Complete with 0.1PB to the final volume.
The solution can be stored at 4°C for up to 1 month.
The following equipment will be needed: stirring plate, magnetic stirrer, glass Pyrex bottle.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e Matemática Experimental (MetaBIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e Matemática Experimental (MetaBIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB)BrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB)BrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Manaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)BrazilManaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Manaus, AM, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior (PPG-BADPI). Manaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)BrazilManaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior (PPG-BADPI). Manaus, AM, Brazil
Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB)BrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Biologia e Conservação de Mamíferos Aquáticos da Amazônia (BioMa), Belém, PA, BrazilUniversidade Federal Rural da AmazôniaBrazilBelém, PA, Brazil Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Biologia e Conservação de Mamíferos Aquáticos da Amazônia (BioMa), Belém, PA, Brazil
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Ecologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Ecologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Centro de Estudos da Várzea, Rede de Pesquisa e Conservação de Sirênios no Estuário Amazônico (SEA), Tefé, AM, BrazilInstituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável MamirauáBrazilTefé, AM, BrazilInstituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Centro de Estudos da Várzea, Rede de Pesquisa e Conservação de Sirênios no Estuário Amazônico (SEA), Tefé, AM, Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha (Ecomar), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha (Ecomar), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Bruno MOTA
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e Matemática Experimental (MetaBIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e Matemática Experimental (MetaBIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB)BrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Vera Maria Ferreira DA SILVA
Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB)BrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Manaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)BrazilManaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Manaus, AM, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior (PPG-BADPI). Manaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)BrazilManaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior (PPG-BADPI). Manaus, AM, Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e Matemática Experimental (MetaBIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Laboratório de Biologia Teórica e Matemática Experimental (MetaBIO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Rede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB)BrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilRede Brasileira de Neurobiodiversidade (RBNB), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Biologia e Conservação de Mamíferos Aquáticos da Amazônia (BioMa), Belém, PA, BrazilUniversidade Federal Rural da AmazôniaBrazilBelém, PA, Brazil Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Biologia e Conservação de Mamíferos Aquáticos da Amazônia (BioMa), Belém, PA, Brazil
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Ecologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Ecologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Centro de Estudos da Várzea, Rede de Pesquisa e Conservação de Sirênios no Estuário Amazônico (SEA), Tefé, AM, BrazilInstituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável MamirauáBrazilTefé, AM, BrazilInstituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, Centro de Estudos da Várzea, Rede de Pesquisa e Conservação de Sirênios no Estuário Amazônico (SEA), Tefé, AM, Brazil
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha (Ecomar), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazilRio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação Marinha (Ecomar), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Manaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)BrazilManaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Manaus, AM, Brazil
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior (PPG-BADPI). Manaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)BrazilManaus, AM, BrazilInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior (PPG-BADPI). Manaus, AM, Brazil
Figure 2
Line of incision (dashed line) behind the occipital condyle to separate the head from the body of Amazonian manatees, showing the position of the brain inside the skull in lateral (A) and dorsal (B) view; C - Sketch showing the removal of skin and muscles from the head to allow the visualization of the skull bones. Illustrations by Gabriel Melo-Santos.
Figure 3
Delimitation of the cutting area (dashed line) of the head of Amazonian manatees in lateral (A), dorsal (B, D), and posterior (C) view. The supraoccipital-exoccipital synchondrosis is the ossification area between the supraoccipital bone and exoccipital bones shown in the red dotted line. The syringe in (C) indicates the injection point for fixative into the brain through the foramen magnum. The spatula in (D) indicates the insertion movement to release the brain from the skull after fixation. Once brain extraction is complete, the skullcap can be returned to its original position, maintaining the complete structure of the skull. Illustrations by Gabriel Melo-Santos.
Figure 4
Brain of an Amazonian manatee calf in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views after its removal from the skull. The right hemisphere in the dorsal view still conserves the meninges. Abbreviations: bs: brainstem; cb: cerebellum; cc: cerebral cortex; rh: right hemisphere; lh: left hemisphere. Scale bar = 1cm.
Table S1
Composition of the phosphate buffer (PB) 0.4M used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Table S2
Composition of the 0.1 M sodium azide (NaAz) solution used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Table S3
Composition of the 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1M PB solution used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Table S4
Composition of the 30% sucrose solution that can be used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
imageFigure 1
Dissection tools used in the process of brain removal of Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) calves.
open_in_new
imageFigure 2
Line of incision (dashed line) behind the occipital condyle to separate the head from the body of Amazonian manatees, showing the position of the brain inside the skull in lateral (A) and dorsal (B) view; C - Sketch showing the removal of skin and muscles from the head to allow the visualization of the skull bones. Illustrations by Gabriel Melo-Santos.
open_in_new
imageFigure 3
Delimitation of the cutting area (dashed line) of the head of Amazonian manatees in lateral (A), dorsal (B, D), and posterior (C) view. The supraoccipital-exoccipital synchondrosis is the ossification area between the supraoccipital bone and exoccipital bones shown in the red dotted line. The syringe in (C) indicates the injection point for fixative into the brain through the foramen magnum. The spatula in (D) indicates the insertion movement to release the brain from the skull after fixation. Once brain extraction is complete, the skullcap can be returned to its original position, maintaining the complete structure of the skull. Illustrations by Gabriel Melo-Santos.
open_in_new
imageFigure 4
Brain of an Amazonian manatee calf in dorsal (left) and lateral (right) views after its removal from the skull. The right hemisphere in the dorsal view still conserves the meninges. Abbreviations: bs: brainstem; cb: cerebellum; cc: cerebral cortex; rh: right hemisphere; lh: left hemisphere. Scale bar = 1cm.
open_in_new
table_chartTable 1
Information about the specimens of Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis) used in this study. NA = Not available information.
Animal identification
Sex
Standard length* (cm)
Body weight (kg)
Pb #291
Male
84
10
Pb #293
Male
83
11
Pb #294
Male
92
14
Frozen head 1
NA
NA
NA
Frozen head 2
NA
NA
NA
table_chartTable S1
Composition of the phosphate buffer (PB) 0.4M used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
table_chartTable S2
Composition of the 0.1 M sodium azide (NaAz) solution used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Ingredient
Total volume (L)
1
5
10
0.1 M PB (L)
1
5
10
Sodium azide (g)
1
5
10
table_chartTable S3
Composition of the 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1M PB solution used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Ingredient
Total volume (L)
1
5
10
Distilled water
0.75
3.75
7.5
PFA powder stir (g)
40
200
400
NaOH 10M
drops
drops
drops
0.4M PB (L)
0.25
1.25
2.5
table_chartTable S4
Composition of the 30% sucrose solution that can be used in the protocol for skull-preserving removal of the whole brain of Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis).
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaAv. André Araujo, 2936 Aleixo, 69060-001 Manaus AM Brasil, Tel.: +55 92 3643-3030, Fax: +55 92 643-3223 -
Manaus -
AM -
Brazil E-mail: acta@inpa.gov.br
rss_feed
Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader