Revista Direito GV
Brief History
|
Revista Direito GV publishes articles of law or interdisciplinary approach, which result from empirical and theoretical research in dialogue with the fields of research in law and development, law and society, and law and economics. Its mission is to disseminate research results that adopt a perspective of reflection on law “in context” and a concept of development that goes beyond the idea of economic growth, incorporating the promotion of fundamental freedoms and rights, the consolidation of democracy, the overcoming of the colonial past and inequalities, and the fight against various forms of oppression, such as race, gender and sexual orientation. |
Open Acess
|
This Journal adheres to the Open Access model, enabling virtual access, without restriction (including financial ones), to all scientific texts it publishes. Open Access is the condition where the copyright holder of a scholarly work (in this case, the author) grants usage rights to others using an open license (here, Creative Commons Attribution, CC-BY), allowing for immediate free access to the work and permitting any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Compliance with Open Science
|
Aligned with the good practices of open science communication, authors are required to complete the Open Science Compliance Form, in which authors are requested to inform: (a) if the manuscript is a preprint and, if so, its location; (b) whether data, software codes and other materials underlying the manuscript text are properly cited and referenced; and, (c) whether opening options are accepted in the peer review process. In line with good open science communication practices, the journal accepts manuscripts deposited on reliable preprint servers, such as SciELO Preprints. In such cases, the Open Science Compliance Form must contain the virtual location of the version of the article already published (access link) and the DOI, if applicable. In addition, in such cases, the evaluation system is changed –from double-blind to single-blind by peers–, in which the reviewers will know the authorship of the article, but the authors will not know the identity of the reviewers. In these cases, we emphasize the possibility of reviewers manifesting a conflict of interest in the evaluation of the article. |
Ethics in Publishing
|
Revista Direito GV preserves the commitment of maintaining the utmost level of integrity in the content published, with the aim of guiding its procedures for the management and evaluation of articles by the Código de Boas Práticas Científicas, provided by the Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP, 2014), by the Guia de Boas Práticas para o Fortalecimento da Ética na Publicação Científica de SciELO (SciELO, 2018a), by the basic guidelines formulated by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, 2016), by the Core Practices (COPE, 2017a) and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE/DOAJ/OASPA/WAME, 2018). We request special attention to the parameters indicated in the document Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors (COPE, 2011). Articles involving research with humans or animals must comply with the ethical standards required by the Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa/Conselho Nacional de Saúde/Ministério da Saúde (CONEP/CNS/MS). Research involving human beings must comply with the norms of Resolution No. 466/2012 and Resolution No. 510/2016 of the Conselho Nacional de Saúde (National Health Council, CNS) – or any other norm that replaces them – or of an equivalent body in the country of origin of the research. |
Focus and Scope
|
Revista Direito GV publishes articles of law or interdisciplinary approach, which result from empirical and theoretical research in dialogue with the fields of research in law and development, law and society, and law and economics. Its mission is to disseminate research results that adopt a perspective of reflection on law “in context” and a concept of development that goes beyond the idea of economic growth, incorporating the promotion of fundamental freedoms and rights, the consolidation of democracy, the overcoming of the colonial past and inequalities, and the fight against various forms of oppression, such as race, gender and sexual orientation. The articles can address law both from the description, observation, analysis, diagnosis, criticism and proposal of solutions for the functioning of legal institutions and through doctrinal reflections open to the social context and attentive to the sociopolitical and economic disputes that occur through the grammar of law. Articles must be unpublished (national or internationally) and original. By unpublished we understand as articles not published in any other printed or digital medium in Portuguese or in a foreign language. By originals, we understand the texts that innovate within the field of research in which they are inserted. At the discretion of the Editorial Board, the journal may publish non-unpublished articles of exceptional academic value. Within its thematic scope, the journal also publishes original reviews of books published in the last two years and translations of texts by foreign authors whose diffusion is fundamental for the development of Brazilian academic research. Articles and reviews can be submitted in Portuguese, English and Spanish. In order to facilitate the international dissemination of the papers, the submission of articles in English is encouraged, regardless of the nationality of the authors. The translations will be published only in Portuguese. Manuscripts submitted may not be under evaluation in another journal. |
Digital Preservation
|
This Journal adheres to the standards defined in the Digital Preservation Policy of the SciELO Program. Additionally, Revista Direito GV uses LOCKSS to create an archive system distributed among participating libraries and allows them to create permanent archives of the journal for preservation and restoration. Learn more on https://www.lockss.org/. |
Indexing Sources
Bibliographic Record
|
Websites e Social Media
|
https://direitosp.fgv.br/revista-direito-gv |
Preprints
|
In line with good open science communication practices, the journal accepts manuscripts deposited on reliable preprint servers, such as SciELO Preprints. In such cases, the Open Science Compliance Form must contain the virtual location of the version of the article already published (access link) and the DOI, if applicable. In addition, in such cases, the evaluation system is changed –from double-blind to single-blind by peers–, in which the reviewers will know the authorship of the article, but the authors will not know the identity of the reviewers. In these cases, we emphasize the possibility of reviewers manifesting a conflict of interest in the evaluation of the article. A preprint is defined as a manuscript ready for submission to a journal and deposited in preprint servers, either before or concurrently with journal submission, to expedite research communication. The use of preprints is an option and decision of the authors, encouraged by this journal. |
Peer Review Process
|
The articles submitted to Revista Direito GV undergo two evaluation filters. 1 – Desk review All articles received undergo a desk review carried out by the Editorial Board to verify compliance with the mandatory formal submission requirements provided in the section “Guidelines for authors”, including their uniqueness, the adequacy of the text to the thematic and methodological scope of the journal and its originality, indicating its potential for publication. At this early stage, similarity verification is also performed using antiplagiarism software. Articles that meet these requirements will proceed to the peer review phase. 2 – Blind peer review The articles that go through the first filter – desk review – are sent to the second filter: blind peer review, carried out by at least two ad hoc evaluators. Reviewers can suggest five types of decisions (accept; accept as long as minor corrections are made – minor revisions –; accept as long as substantive corrections are made – major revisions –; reject and resubmit; and reject). To be eligible for publication, the article may not have received any “reject and resubmit” or “reject” evaluation. Peer reviews should be guided exclusively by the objective of advancing knowledge within the field to which the manuscript belongs. Any suspicion of conflict of interest that may impair the objectivity and impartiality of the evaluation must be communicated to the editorial team. Access the evaluation form in Portuguese, English and Spanish. If the article is deposited on a preprints server or a partially public server, the peer evaluation system changes from double-blind to single-blind, where the reviewers will know the authorship of the article, but the authors will not know the identity of the reviewers. 3 – Other stages of evaluation Once the opinions have been received, they are forwarded to the corresponding author of the article for his/her acknowledgment and, if applicable, incorporate the suggested modifications. In the latter case, the modified text should be sent to the journal within the stipulated period along with a “reply letter” detailing the modifications made to the editor and the reviewers. The corresponding author must follow the journal’s formatting and submission rules. Modifications made to the text should be made using the “Track Changes” tool in the Microsoft Word text editor. The modified text will be evaluated again by the editor according to the changes made. The editor may refer it to the same evaluators of the previous stage or to others, if necessary, before the final decision of approval or rejection. The final decision of approval or rejection depends, fundamentally, on three factors: (i) the article not having received any “rejection” or “rejection and resubmission” evaluation throughout the process, (ii) the individual quality of the text after the modifications made, if any, and (iii) the relative quality of the text in light of the set of articles in stock for publication at the time of the decision. Once approved, the articles will be sent to the processes of copyediting, layout development and formal and orthographic review. They will be sent to the authors in case of doubts and for final validation before publication. In this validation, no modifications or will be allowed, except in exceptional cases. The editor may suggest changes and cuts in the texts to better adapt them to the standards of the journal. The approved articles follow an order of publication that will respect, whenever possible, antiquity in submission and approval, as well as formal criteria applicable to the Qualis/Capes A1 journals –or criteria that may replace them– and the criteria suggested by SciELO. Accepted and published articles that remain available on preprint servers should indicate the link of the version published in Revista Direito GV. Reviews and translations will be evaluated and selected by the Editorial Board of the journal. New submissions of articles that have received an editorial decision of “rejection” will not be accepted. Informed peer review – Options for openness in the peer review process The journal adopts three openness options, aligning with SciELO guidelines: 1) The first entails disclosing the names of editors responsible for the evaluation in the final article. This information is consistently included in all publications of Revista Direito GV. 2) The second option allows reviewers the choice to engage in direct dialogue with the corresponding author, with or without revealing their identities. Reviewers and authors may also mutually agree to disclose their identities during the evaluation process. 3) The third option involves publishing the reviews of approved articles, with the optional identification of the reviewers. Reviews are considered a new type of literature in the SciELO methodology and receive treatment similar to research articles. |
Open Data
|
In line with Open Science practices, we ask that manuscripts using databases be deposited in open access data repositories, such as SciELO Data, explaining this information in the cover letter. Database is considered as any material that is relevant to the replication of the research. For example:
Regarding citations, in addition to the familiarity with the Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT) rules adopted by the journal, we also suggest reading the document Guia de Citação de Dados de Pesquisa (SCIELO, 2018b). |
Fee Charging
|
No fees are charged for submission, evaluation or publication. |
Policy on Ethichs and Misconduct, Erratum and Retraction
|
If there is a need for the retraction of an article or publication of correction or errata, Revista Direito GV will follow the recommendations and guidelines of SciELO and COPE, especially the Guia de Boas Práticas para o Fortalecimento da Ética na Publicação Científica (SCIELO, 2018a), the Guia para o Registro e Publicação de Errata (SCIELO, 2020), the Guia para o Registro e Publicação de Retratação (SCIELO, 2019) and the COPE Retraction Guidelines (COPE, 2019). Cases of moderate or mild misconduct may be subject to correction or errata. In cases of serious misconduct, Revista Direito GV may retract the article, which consists of a public instrument to register problems in a published article (Partial Retraction) or communicate its cancellation (Total Retraction). The journal uses similarity detection software to track submissions. If the similarity found indicates plagiarism, the guidelines on plagiarism will be followed. Ad hoc reviewers should follow the COPE guidelines for reviewers, especially the information contained in the Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (COPE, 2017b). |
Conflict of Interest Policy
|
The Revista Direito GV has a conflict of interest policy and adheres to the principles of international, national, and/or institutional standards on how to deal with acts of misconduct, committing to investigate any allegations to ensure research integrity. Conflict of interest can be of a personal, commercial, political, academic, or financial nature. Such conflicts may occur when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that could influence manuscript preparation or evaluation. Upon manuscript submission, authors are responsible for acknowledging and disclosing any financial or other conflicts that may have influenced the work. Should there be any actual or potential conflict of interest, authors must inform the Journal in the cover letter accompanying the submission. For further details, refer to: Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities, and Conflicts of Interest.. |
Adoption of similarity checking software
|
The journal uses the plagiarism detection software iThenticate for similarity checking. If the similarity found indicates plagiarism, the guidelines on plagiarism will be followed. Ad hoc reviewers should follow the COPE guidelines for reviewers, especially the information contained in the Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (COPE, 2017b). Whenever a submission is made to the Journal (e.g., original article, resubmission, review, critique, translation, etc.), the software is utilized to check for similarities. |
Sex and Gender Issues
|
The editorial team of Revista Direito GV, along with the authors publishing in the journal, must always adhere to guidelines on Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER (DEIA in Portuguese, principles of diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility). The DEIA/SAGER guidelines comprise a set of directives guiding the reporting of information on sex and gender in the study design, data analysis, and the interpretation of findings. Additionally, Revista Direito GV observes gender equity policy in the formation of its editorial board. |
Ethics Committee
|
Authors must attach a statement of approval from the ethics committee of the institution responsible for overseeing the research, if applicable. Articles involving research with humans or animals must comply with the ethical standards required by the Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa/Conselho Nacional de Saúde/Ministério da Saúde (CONEP/CNS/MS). Research involving human beings must comply with the norms of Resolution No. 466/2012 and Resolution No. 510/2016 of the Conselho Nacional de Saúde (National Health Council, CNS) – or any other norm that replaces them – or of an equivalent body in the country of origin of the research. |
Copyright
|
Authors of articles published by Revista Direito GV retain the copyright of their works under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided the original work is properly cited. Authors grant Revista de Direito GV the rights of first publication. |
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
|
Website Responsibility: All content of the journal and articles published by Revista de Direito GV, unless otherwise specified, are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license. Author Responsibility: Authors are responsible for obtaining permissions (from individuals, institutions, other authors, and/or publishers) for the use of images, tables, figures, methods, or other elements used in the manuscript to be published. Authors of articles published by Revista de Direito GV retain the copyrights of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restrictions, provided that the original work is properly cited. Revista Direito GV encourages authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts by publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic social media, as well as posting them on their personal social media, provided that the full citation to the journal website version is included. |
Sponsors and Funding Agencies
|
Getulio Vargas Foundation
|
Editor-in-Chief
|
Assistants
|
President of the Editorial Board
|
Editorial Board
|
Accepted Document Types
|
Revista Direito GV publishes articles of law or interdisciplinary approach, which must be unpublished (national or internationally) and original. By unpublished we understand as articles not published in any other printed or digital medium in Portuguese or in a foreign language. By originals, we understand the texts that innovate within the field of research in which they are inserted. At the discretion of the Editorial Board, the journal may publish non-unpublished articles of exceptional academic value. Within its thematic scope, the journal also publishes original reviews of books published in the last two years and translations of texts by foreign authors whose diffusion is fundamental for the development of Brazilian academic research. Articles and reviews can be submitted in Portuguese, English and Spanish. In order to facilitate the international dissemination of the papers, the submission of articles in English is encouraged, regardless of the nationality of the authors. The translations will be published only in Portuguese. The journal accepts and encourages the deposit of manuscripts in reliable preprint servers (see "Preprints" below). Manuscripts submitted may not be under evaluation in another journal. |
Guidelines for authors (Updated in March, 2024)
|
All submissions must be made through the ScholarOne Manuscripts online system. The corresponding author will be responsible for the veracity of all the information provided, including in relation to the co-authors, if any. All submissions must contain, at least (i) the text of the manuscript (article, critical comment, review or translation), (ii) the cover letter; and (iii) the Open Science Compliance Form. The specific information for each type of document is as follows. Authorship Revista Direito GV accepts articles of unique authorship or co-authorship. In the case of unique authorship, the author must hold at least a master’s degree. Co-authored articles must have a maximum of three co-authors, in which at least one co-author must have a PhD. In such cases, a paragraph should be added to the cover letter, precisely describing the contribution of each co-author to the writing of the final text submitted. Exceptionally, and at the discretion of the editorial staff, articles with more than three co-authors will be accepted when they result from highly complex empirical research. The motivation for the inclusion of more co-authors should be put in the cover letter, explaining the underlying concrete situation and describing the contribution of each author in detail. For configuration of authorship, it is necessary that all authors who appear in the submission have concomitantly: 1) made substantial contributions to the conception or structure of the manuscript; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the research resulting from the manuscript; 2) written all or a substantial part of the manuscript; or critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, offering improvements; 3) approved the version to be published; and 4) agreed to be responsible for all aspects of the final version of the submitted text, ensuring that issues related to the accuracy, ethics or integrity of any part of the study are adequately investigated and resolved. Contributions prior to the final version, including the supervision and guidance for undergraduate, masters and PhD theses, do not automatically constitute co-authorship and should be included in the acknowledgments section. Authors and co-authors can only submit one article at a time, either as a corresponding author or as a co-author. |
Taxonomia CRedit
|
Information about authorship should be included in the cover letter, containing the contribution of each co-author to the final submitted text, following the CREdit taxonomy. This taxonomy consists of 14 functions that should be used to represent the specific contribution of each co-author. It is important to note that multiple terms can be assigned to a single author, and the terms are not mutually exclusive, meaning they can be repeated among the authors according to the characteristics of the article's writing. We request that authors indicate their roles, in English, which will appear in the final version of the article and can be found at: http://credit.niso.org/. |
Submission of articles – including guest and thematic dossier articles
|
Phase 1 – Preparation of the original documents required for submission Before starting the submission, the corresponding author must prepare two indispensable documents for the desk review phase: (i) article, (ii) cover letter, and (iii) the Compliance with Open Science Form. Optionally, they may prepare (iv) additional documents for insertion into the ScholarOne system. additional documents for insertion in the ScholarOne system. (i) Article Articles must have a maximum of 10,000 words (including pre-textual and post-textual elements, notes, tables, graphs, bibliographical references, etc. 1) Document formatting, citations, references and extension:
Note: Articles from foreign authors who use other citation and referencing methods will be accepted; however, if approved, these articles will be standardized according to ABNT in the editing stages, and their authors should commit to the review of their article after this standardization. Long citations (of 4 lines or more) should be presented in a highlighted paragraph with indentation (of 2 cm) and lower font size (10).
2) Mandatory content of the document The first page of the article must contain:
(ii) Cover Letter
(iii) Open Science Compliance Form This form allows authors to communicate the manuscript’s adherence to Open Science practices. Authors must inform: (a) whether the manuscript is a preprint and, if affirmative, provide its location; (b) whether data, program codes, and other materials underlying the manuscript text are properly cited and referenced; and (c) their willingness to consider open options in the peer review process. The corresponding author must provide information on the alignment of the research and the compliance of the manuscript with Open Science practices by completing and attaching the Open Science Compliance Form as a supplementary file to the manuscript. The form will be shared with publishers and ad hoc reviewers. Articles that do not meet all of the three formal requirements listed above will be rejected immediately during the review in the desk review phase). (iv) Additional files When necessary, other attachments should be included in the submission, such as databases, documents containing tables, graphs and other figures in their original version, interview forms, approval of the research in the institution’s research ethics board, etc. In line with Open Science practices, we ask that manuscripts using databases be deposited in open access data repositories, such as SciELO Data, explaining this information in the cover letter. Database is considered as any material that is relevant to the replication of the research. For example:
The data must be shared in data repositories at the time of submission (we recommend SciELO Data). Phase 2 – Submission on the ScholarOne System Once the required documents previously described are prepared, the submission of the manuscript must be made through ScholarOne, the journal’s online system. Submissions by email or any other means will not be accepted. The submission will be carried out in six stages. Follow the system guidelines for completing each step. Fill in all available fields. Below are some points that deserve special care:
[1] The CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) taxonomy is a standard of attribution of fourteen different roles that may exist in the composition of authorship of an academic text and standardized distinction between authorship and contributions recognized via acknowledgments. For general information about CRediT, access: https://credit.niso.org/. The CRediT taxonomy implies that, for any area of knowledge, any of those roles automatically constitute authorship. Variations exist. It is worth noting that Revista Direito GV assigns specific interpretation to what constitutes an author or co-author and which contributions are not authorial and should be mentioned in the acknowledgments. |
Submission of critical comments
|
Critical comments and rejoinders must contain a maximum of 6,000 words, including pre-textual and textual elements. They should contain the title and subtitle, if any, in Portuguese, in English and Spanish, with a maximum of twenty-five (25) words each. They should also include an abstract in Portuguese, English and Spanish with a maximum of two hundred (200) words each, and 5 keywords for each language – in Portuguese, English and Spanish. The steps of preparation of the submission, the ScholarOne submission steps, the rules for formatting the document, citation and references, as well as the completion of the cover letter, are the same applicable to the articles. |
Submission of reviews
|
Reviews must have a maximum of 2,000 words, including notes and bibliographical references. They must present a title in Portuguese, English and Spanish of a maximum of 25 words and 5 keywords in each of the three languages. At the beginning of the text, the review should also present the complete reference of the work reviewed in the ABNT standard. This information must also be included in the cover letter. For the submission of reviews on the ScholarOne Manuscripts system, it is necessary to fill in the “Abstract” field in step 1, and this element is dispensed in the body of the submitted manuscript. The steps of preparation of the submission, the ScholarOne submission steps, the rules for formatting the document, citation and references, as well as the completion of the cover letter, are the same applicable to the articles. |
Submission of translations
|
Translations are not limited in length and, as a general rule, the stylistic and citation elements of the original text may be maintained. If the translation project is approved, the editorial production team of the journal may suggest adaptations. Extensive texts can be published at the discretion of the editor. The cover letter must provide complete information on the original text, including the status of the translation or republication property rights. Please attach the original text for evaluation. If not possible, please indicate the link where it can be found. The letter should also identify all translators with complete data and available information about the author of the original text (full name without abbreviations, title, institution to which he/she is or has been linked and e-mail, if any). Include in the cover letter or as an additional document any other information useful to the process of acquiring translation rights, including information on contacts with the original copyright holder, copies of e-mail exchanges, etc. The steps of preparation of the submission, the ScholarOne submission steps, and other rules of completion of the cover letter are the same applicable to the articles. |
Preprints
|
In adherence to open science communication best practices, the journal welcomes and supports the submission of manuscripts to reputable preprint servers, such as SciELO Preprints. In these instances, the Open Science Compliance Form should include the virtual location of the already published article version (i.e. access link) and the DOI, if applicable. Furthermore, under such circumstances, the peer-review process shifts from double-blind to single-blind, wherein reviewers are aware of the authors’ identities, while the authors remain unaware of the reviewers’ identities (with the provision for reviewers to disclose any conflicts of interest). A preprint is defined as a manuscript ready for submission to a journal and deposited in preprint servers, either before or concurrently with journal submission, to expedite research communication. The use of preprints is an option and decision of the authors, encouraged by this journal. |
Informed peer review – Options for openness in the peer review process
|
The journal adopts three openness options, aligning with SciELO guidelines: 1) The first entails disclosing the names of editors responsible for the evaluation in the final article. This information is consistently included in all publications of Revista Direito GV. 2) The second option allows reviewers the choice to engage in direct dialogue with the corresponding author, with or without revealing their identities. Reviewers and authors may also mutually agree to disclose their identities during the evaluation process. 3) The third option involves publishing the reviews of approved articles, with the optional identification of the reviewers. Reviews are considered a new type of literature in the SciELO methodology and receive treatment similar to research articles. |
Questions and information about submission
|
If you have any questions about the online submission, send an e-mail to the editorial team: revistadireitogv@fgv.br. |
Digital Assets
|
Diagrams, graphs, figures, charts and tables: must have the title and source. The original files must be sent as attachments to the submission in the “original files” field. Photographs, logos or other images: in case of the need to use photographs, logos or other images, the following will be necessary: (1) they have been taken/prepared by the author(s) of the article, (2) or the authors must have a written permission from the copyright holder(s) of the image for publication in the article; or (3) the photographs, logos or other images are available for reproduction with non-commercial use (for example, protected under the Creative Commons 4.0 license), provided that their respective source is properly cited. |
Funding Declaration
|
Revista Direito GV is an academic publication from the Fundação Getulio Vargas Sao Paulo Law School (FGV DIREITO SP). |
Contact Information
|
Getulio Vargas Foundation |
References
|
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução n. 510, de 7 de abril de 2016. Normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília, 2016. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2016/res0510_07_04_2016.html. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução n. 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Diretrizes e Normas Regulamentadoras de Pesquisas envolvendo Seres Humanos. Brasília, 2012. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION ETHICS (COPE). Core Practices. [S.l.: COPE], 2017a. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/core-practices. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION ETHICS (COPE). COPE Retraction Guidelines – English. S.l.: COPE, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. COMMITTEE OF PUBLICATION ETHICS (COPE). COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers — English. S.l.: COPE, 2017b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. COPE/DOAJ/OASPA/WAME. Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing. S.l.: COPE/DOAJ/OASPA/WAME, 2018. Disponível em: https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO (CNPQ). Diretrizes. [Brasília: CNPQ], 2016. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br/composicao/comissao-de-integridade/diretrizes. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO (FAPESP). Código de Boas Práticas Científicas. São Paulo: FAPESP, 2014. Disponível em: https://fapesp.br/boaspraticas/2014/FAPESP-Codigo_de_Boas_Praticas_Cientificas.pdf. Acesso em: 5 maio 2021. SCIELO. Guia para o registro e publicação de Errata [on-line]. SciELO, 2020. Disponível em: https://wp.scielo.org/wp-content/uploads/guia_errata.pdf. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. SCIELO. Guia para o registro e publicação de retratação [on-line]. SciELO, 2019. Disponível em: https://wp.scielo.org/wp-content/uploads/guia_retratacao.pdf. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. SCIELO. Guia de boas práticas para o fortalecimento da ética na publicação científica [on-line]. SciELO, Versão setembro 2018a. Disponível em: https://wp.scielo.org/wp-content/uploads/Guia-de-Boas-Praticas-para-o-Fortalecimento-da-Etica-na-Publicacao-Cientifica.pdf. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. SCIELO. Guia de citação de dados de pesquisa [on-line]. SciELO, 2018b. Disponível em: https://wp.scielo.org/wp-content/uploads/guia-de-citacao-de-dados_pt.pdf. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2022. |
