Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama
Brief History
|
Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama (RBP) was created in 1993 as an official publication vehicle of the Federação Brasileira de Psicodrama (Febrap). In order to speed up the disclosure of its content, in 2022, RBP adopted continuous publication. RBP proposes to: Publish researches that are representative of the entire research community, highlighting the growing diversity among researchers, thus enriching the ability to find solutions to research challenges and beyond; Increase the publication of researches that studies ethnic-racial relations, intersectional issues, and inequalities faced by vulnerable populations; Take care of related science topics of interest to the psychodramatic community; Prioritize the publication of original articles and restrict to no more than two experience reports and two reviews per issue. |
Open Science Compliance
|
RBP is committed to open science initiatives and will progressively offer reviewers and corresponding authors the openness of their identities according to the use of the Open Science Compliance Form, which must be submitted as a supplementary file to the manuscript. The Journal also accepts articles previously published in preprint repositories such as SciELO Preprints and EmeRI. We encourage authors to share their data in trusted repositories such as Dryad, Figshare, Zenodo, Mendeley Date, OSF and SciELO Data. |
Focus and Scope
|
Its scope, in the Human Sciences, falls within the area of psychology, focusing on the specialties of Sociodynamics, Sociometry, Sociatrics, the latter being composed of the subspecialties: Group Psychotherapy, Sociodrama and Psychodrama. It also proposes to take care of related science topics of interest to the psychodramatic community. |
Digital Preservation
|
This journal follows the standards defined in the Digital Preservation Policy of the SciELO Program, seeking to ensure that the manuscripts published here are available to future generations, following the legislation of ethics and good practices nationally and internationally in publications. |
Indexing Sources
|
Articles published by the Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama are indexed/added in:
The classification of RBP in the Qualis/Capes system is B1. |
Bibliographic Sheet
|
- Journal Title: Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama |
Websites and Social Media
|
|
EDITORIAL POLICY
Preprints
|
RBP accepts the publication of preprint articles, which in addition to speeding up the communication of research results, allows the author to receive feedback on the work from readers and make the modifications it deems pertinent. A preprint is defined as a manuscript that is ready for submission to a journal and that is deposited on trusted preprint servers before or in parallel with submission to a journal. The use of the preprint is the author's choice, and it is assumed that when submitting the article to the journal, through the Open Science Compliance Form, the name of the Preprint server and the DOI of the Preprint are informed. The articles submitted to preprints share with the journals the originality in the publication and the evaluation process will not use the double anonymized procedure, since the authorship will be known. |
Peer Review Process
|
The manuscripts will be received by the editorial department, which will initially check the similarity of the content (plagiarism) through the Similarity Check system. For manuscripts with no or low similarity content, a section editor (SE) will be assigned. The SE will appoint two to four external evaluators (ad hoc reviewers) in anonymized mode, ensuring complete anonymity. Manuscripts submitted previously or in parallel to the preprint platforms will be accepted for evaluation, and RBP may adopt open peer review with prior consent from the authors and reviewers. To this end, authors must submit the Open Science Compliance Form as a supplementary file to the manuscript. Ad hoc reviewers should have no conflict of interest and should be committed to a fair trial and treat articles confidentially. Their conclusions should be objective, pointing out relevant articles that have not been cited. After receiving the evaluations, the SE must make a decision on the manuscript based on the recommendations of the reviewers. He can accept the manuscript as it was submitted, reject it, or request revisions. The manuscript that needs revision will be sent to the author, who must submit a new version and a letter to the editor, in which each recommendation of the reviewers must be commented. Additional and/or amended paragraphs should be highlighted. If the author does not agree with the evaluator's suggestions, it is necessary to explain the reasons. After verifying adherence to the recommendations of the new version, the SE must make the final decision or, exceptionally, refer the article to another round of evaluations if the changes have not been sufficiently addressed. The entire process will be available to the authors at any time. In cases where the authors do not agree with the final decision, one may appeal the decision by sending an email to the editors-in-chief, who will review the process and may reconsider if justified. |
Open Data
|
Authors will be encouraged, whenever applicable, to deposit and share the data, codes and/or methods used in the production of the manuscript, and it is up to the responsible author to inform, during the submission process, the repository in which the deposit was made, allowing access to reviewers and editors, unless this is not possible for ethical, privacy or confidentiality reasons. To ensure full transparency of the data obtained, RBP requires authors to declare that for data not made available in public repositories, such data is available upon request. In this case, authors should state why these data are not publicly available. Alternatively, authors may make the data available as a supplementary file to the manuscript. If data sharing is not applicable to the article, as no dataset was generated or analyzed during the current study, this should be declared. Survey data includes, but is not limited to raw data, processed data, spreadsheets, statistics, laboratory notebooks, field notebooks, questionnaires, photographs, methodologies, standards, and protocols. Visit re3data.org to identify certified data repositories relevant to the subject area, including Dryad, Figshare, Zenodo, Mendeley Date, OSF and SciELO Data. |
Fees
|
RBP does not charge fees for submission or processing of articles, and the editing process is carried out entirely by RBP. |
Ethics and Misconduct Policy, Erratum and Retraction
|
RBP is committed to high standards of ethical behavior at all stages of the publication process in accordance with the procedures established by international institutions, such as Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), by the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME); Code of Good Scientific Practice, the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP); and the Guide to Good Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publishing of the Online Scientific Electronic Library (SciELO). These procedures apply to the management of the journal and its editorial practices, with emphasis on the relationships with authors and, especially, on the evaluation of their manuscripts. Published articles that contain seriously flawed data, such that their findings and conclusions cannot be trusted, may be retracted in order to correct the scientific record. Additions, corrections, and retractions may be requested by the author(s) or initiated by the editors-in-chief after discussion with the corresponding author. Readers who detect important errors in the work of others should contact the corresponding author of that work. All additions, corrections, and retractions are subject to the approval of the editors-in-chief, but minor corrections and additions will not be published. The corresponding author must obtain the approval of all co-authors of the article before requesting/submitting additions, corrections, and retractions or providing evidence that such approval has been requested. Additions, corrections, and retractions will contain information about the title of the original article, the list of authors, and the reason for the retraction. The originally published article will remain on the web, except in extraordinary circumstances. |
Conflict of Interest Policy
|
RBP requires authors, upon their submission, to declare conflicts of interest, which may arise when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that are not fully apparent and that may influence their judgments about what is published. Authors must declare all forms of financial support; any commercial or financial involvements that may present an appearance of conflicts of interest; if an agreement has been signed with any sponsor of the research that prevents you from publishing positive and negative results or that prohibits you from publishing the research without their prior approval. In cases where there is none, authors must declare: "The Author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest". Articles will be fairly evaluated and will not necessarily be rejected when conflicting interests are declared. The editor-in-chief is responsible for assessing declared conflicts of interest in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). In this way, the following parties are expected to: *Authors: When they submit a manuscript, they are responsible for acknowledging and disclosing financial or other conflicts that may have influenced their work. They should acknowledge all financial support for the work and other financial or personal connections with respect to the research. *Reviewers: They should disclose to the editors any conflicts of interest that could influence their opinions about the manuscript and should declare themselves unqualified to review specific manuscripts if they believe that this procedure is appropriate. As in the case of the authors, if there is silence on the part of the evaluators about potential conflicts, it may mean that such conflicts exist and that they have not been disclosed or that conflicts do not exist. Accordingly, evaluators are also asked to provide competitive interest statements, which are used to assess the value of peer reports. *Editors: They should declare potential conflicts of interest in the evaluation of manuscripts, as well as act to prevent conflicts of interest involving authors and reviewers from compromising ethical standards in publication. |
Adoption of Similarity Checking Software
|
All submissions are submitted to the Similarity Check system for similarity evaluation. In case of detection of a significant degree of similarity with a text already published, the corresponding author will be contacted for adjustments to the text, and the article may be refused, in view of the requirement of originality and originality. |
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA)
|
RBP is committed to the principles of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA) in its practices aimed at expanding knowledge and improving the human condition. RBP seeks to address systemic inequalities and biases by promoting equitable opportunities for authors and an inclusive environment, representing the wide range of people that psychodrama consists of and serves. Section editors are guided and motivated to: (1) Improve diversity in the choice of reviewers; (2) Encourage authors to adopt more inclusive citation practices in their decisions; (3) Foster inclusive language. Editors-in-chief, attentive to increasing diversity and recognizing the barriers that authors, editors, and reviewers belonging to historically excluded populations face due to markers such as race, gender, class, sexuality, disability, among others, always seek to: (1) Avoid discrepancies in the acceptance of articles, focusing on increasing the diversity of authors, reviewers, and editors; (2) Mitigate both the risk and impact of biases on decision-making during the review; (3) Identify alternative processes to disrupt biases; (4) Adopt standards for inclusive culture. |
Ethical Principles in Research
|
Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Conep) is directly linked to the Conselho Nacional de Saúde (CNS), and provides that all research presents some risk, even if minimal, and it is the researcher's responsibility to pay attention to and mitigate these risks. According to the ethical guidelines in research, in order to be ethical, research must: respect the research participant in his/her dignity and autonomy, recognizing his/her vulnerability, assuring his/her willingness to contribute and remain, or not, in the research, through express, free and informed manifestation; weigh between risks and benefits, both known and potential, individual or collective, committing to maximum benefits and minimum harm and risk; ensure that foreseeable damage is avoided; and have social relevance, which guarantees the equal consideration of the interests involved, without losing the sense of their socio-humanitarian destination. To ensure that the manuscripts published in RBP comply with the ethical principles in research with human beings, it is necessary that the authors pay attention to the Resolutions 466/12 and 510/2016 of the Conselho Nacional de Saúde, respecting the federal legislation on ethics in research. For research in a virtual environment, the following are taken as a reference: Guidelines for procedures in research with any stage in a virtual environment, established by the Conselho Nacional de Saúde Committee. For authors whose research was carried out abroad, one must prove that their research followed the ethical guidelines in research according to the country of origin; recalling, however, that the RBP respects and meets the international ethical guidelines for health-related research involving human beings (CIOMS Ethical Guidelines), prepared by the Council of International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). |
Copyright
|
RBP adopts the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 license. Thus, the copyright will belong to the authors, and others will be allowed to distribute, remix, adapt their work and create based on it, even for commercial purposes, as long as proper credit is given. Likewise, authors are responsible for the content of the published article. The authors grant the Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama the rights of first publication. |
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
|
All RBP content, except where otherwise specified, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 license. RBP encourages authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts by publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic social media, as well as posting them on their personal social media, provided that the full citation is included in the website version of the journal. |
Editors-in-chief
|
Section editors
Editorial Responsability
|
Federação Brasileira de Psicodrama |
Editorial office
|
Linceu Editorial Ltda |
|
All authors must have made a significant contribution to the research. RBP endorses the CRediT taxonomy of contributor roles, and for the "Author contributions" section, the following roles will be required: Conceptualization; Methodology; Research; Writing – Original Draft; Writing – Proofreading and Editing; Acquisition of financing; Resources; and Supervision. Contributions from anyone who does not meet the authorship criteria should be listed, with the contributor's permission, in the "Acknowledgments" section (e.g., to recognize people who provided technical help, data collection, written assistance, or a department director who provided general support). Before submitting the article, all authors must agree on the order in which their names will be listed in the manuscript. RBP accepts submissions in English (preferably), Portuguese and Spanish. Manuscripts must be submitted via https://revbraspsicodrama.org.br/rbp/about/submissions and be in accordance with the journal's standards, based on the publication manual of the American Psychological Association (APA), 7th edition, 2020. If the authors opt for the double-blind peer review system, it is up to them to ensure that there are no elements capable of identifying them in any part of the article. The authors' data must be informed in a specific field of the system, during the registration process. |
Steps for electronic submission
|
When starting the electronic submission process, the author must register in the system to submit the manuscript, as well as for the monitoring of the editorial process. The editorial process of the manuscripts will only begin with the completion of the submission of all the necessary information and with the registration of all authors and their complete data. The insertion or removal of authors after the manuscript has been submitted will not be allowed. The authors will be informed, through the registered e-mail, about the receipt of the manuscript. Step 1: Author(s)’ Registration At the beginning of the electronic submission process, the following information should be recorded: All authors must be identified with name, ORCID, e-mail, institutional affiliation (name of the institutions in full, with three instances—for example: University/College/Department), city, state and country. The corresponding author must be identified; Manuscript title in Portuguese, English and Spanish; Abstract in Portuguese, English and Spanish; Keywords in Portuguese, English and Spanish. Step 2: Formal Manuscript Submission The manuscript submitted to RBP must be original and unpublished, i.e., not have been published in another media outlet (journal, book, etc.) nor be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. Except in the following cases:
The manuscript was deposited on a preprint platform, and it is mandatory to inform the URL of the article and whether the opening of identities is authorized to enable open review; The opinions expressed in the papers, as well as the accuracy and adequacy of the references, are the sole responsibility of the authors. At the time of submission, the authors must declare conflicts of interest in conducting and/or communicating the research, if any. A copy of the opinion of the Research Ethics Committee, when relevant, should be sent at the time of submission of the manuscript. Without this document, in cases where they are needed, the editorial process will not be initiated. |
Types of Manuscript
|
Manuscripts of the following types will be accepted for evaluation purposes, and must be informed upon submission: Original Article: High-quality reports of original research, based on systematic and thorough investigations. Manuscripts may not exceed the length of 50,000 characters with spaces, including: title, abstract, keywords (in the three languages), appendices and references; Review Article: A critical and timely review of a comprehensive body of research on subjects of interest to the development of psychodrama. Manuscripts may not exceed the length of 50,000 characters with spaces, including: title, abstract, keywords (in all three languages), appendices and references. Experience Report: Manuscript with a complete and succinct description of professional experience, of social and scientific relevance and with results, even if partial. It should deal with a precise theme and/or concept to be deepened (not only the description of a situation experienced), in addition to making clear: the description of the appropriate methodological principles, description of intervention strategies, theory-practice relationship, considerations about the practice carried out. It should have a maximum of 20 thousand characters with spaces, including title, abstract, keywords (in all three languages), attachments, and references. Book Review: Presentation and critical analysis of books relevant to psychodrama and related areas, national or foreign, regularly published in the publishing market in the last two years. Its objective is to inform the reader about the narrative construction of the book, such as: characteristics of the work, central aspects and possibilities and contributions to the psychodramatic field. No abstract and keywords required: maximum of 16,000 characters with spaces. Editorial: At the invitation of the editors-in-chief, texts of relevance to the psychodramatic community will be published. No abstract and keywords required: maximum of 16,000 characters with spaces. |
Manuscript Structure
|
Whenever possible, manuscripts should have the following subsections, differentiated in the text by different styles. Title: Must be informed in Portuguese, English and Spanish (no more than 12 words) and must not contain abbreviations; Abstracts in Portuguese, English and Spanish: A paragraph with no more than 120 words; Keywords: Up to four descriptors, separated by period, presented in Portuguese, English and Spanish, according to the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS) should be included. Keywords should be chosen with adequate precision for ranking purposes, allowing the article to be retrieved along with similar works; Text Body: It must comply with the structure required for each type of work, using italicization for words or expressions that should be emphasized in the text, for instance, foreignisms, such as locus etc., and words that you wish to underline. The citation of the works consulted must be indicated in the text by the author-date system. The author's surname should be written with only the first letter capitalized, both in the body of the text and in parentheses: "Damásio (1975)" or "(Damásio, 1975)". All studies cited in the text should be listed in the references section; Appendices: They should be avoided and only included if they contain information considered indispensable, such as unpublished tests or descriptions of complex equipment or materials; Footnotes: They should be avoided whenever possible. However, if there is no other possibility, they must be indicated by Arabic numerals in the text and presented on the same page to which their numerical references refer; Tables: They should be prepared in Word (.doc) or Excel. In the case of graphical presentations of tables, columns should preferably be used, avoiding other forms of presentation, such as pie, etc.; Figures: It must be JPG file type, with 300 dpi resolution; References: The Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama seeks to meet current criteria for scientific publication. Thus, the reference list should be mostly composed of publications of peer-reviewed scientific articles published in the last five years. The ideal composition of the reference list is 60% in citations of scientific articles and 40% other literature, published in the last five years. References should be cited in alphabetical order by authors' last name. The italic typographic feature is used to highlight the title element of the publication and must be uniform across all references in the same document. It is mandatory to search for and insert the DOI in each reference cited. For up to seven authors, write the authors' last names and initials separated by commas. If the number of authors is eight or more, cite the names of the first six, insert three dots, and add the name of the last author. E.g.: Gilbert, D. G., McClernon, J. F., Rabinovich, N. E., Sugai, C., Plath, L. C., Asgaard, G., … Botros, N. (2004). Effects of quitting smoking on EEG activation and attention last for more than 31 days and are more severe with stress, dependence, DRD2 A1, allele, and depressive traits. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 6(2), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200410001676305 The following are examples of the most common reference cases. For missing cases, see the American Psychological Association (APA) Publication Manual, 7th edition, 2020. Journal articles: Example: Almeida, V. M. C., & Düsenberg, N. B. (2014). Envolvimento do consumidor com o produto: comparação das escalas PII e NIP no contexto brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16(50), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v16i50.959 Book: Example: Ornelas, M. M. G. (2000). Perícia contábil (3rd ed.). Atlas. Complete book with editors: Example: Grinberg, K., & Salles, R. (Eds.). (2009). O Brasil imperial. Civilização Brasileira. Book with institutional author: Example: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (2005). Improving financial literacy: Analysis of issues and policies. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Book with two authors: Example: Alhashim, D. D., & Arpan, J. S. (1992). International dimensions of accounting (3rd ed.). PWS Kent. Book with three to seven authors: Example: Ford, E. W., Duncan, W. J., Bedeian, A. G., Ginter, P. M., Rousculp, M. D., & Adams, A. M. (2003). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2005.19417905 Book with more than seven authors: Example: Gilbert, D. G., McClernon, J. F., Rabinovich, N. E., Sugai, C., Plath, L. C., Asgaard, G., … Botros, N. (2004). Effects of quitting smoking on EEG activation and attention last for more than 31 days and are more severe with stress, dependence, DRD2 A1, allele, and depressive traits. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 6(2), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200410001676305 E-book: Example: Lawrence, P. R. (2001). Changing of organizational behavior patterns. Transaction Publishers. Retrieved from http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=7511860&db=buh Book chapter: Example: Martone, C. L. (2000). Modelo básico para economia fechada e aberta. In L. M. Lopes, & M. A. S. Vasconcellos (Eds.), Manual de macroeconomia: Nível básico e nível intermediário (2nd ed., pp. 299-311). Atlas. Dissertations and theses: Example: Langrafe, T. F. (2015). Desempenho social corporativo em instituições de ensino superior: A percepção dos gestores sobre os stakeholders [Doctoral thesis]. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade, Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/12/12139/tde-25062015-143117/ Scientific events: Example: Silva, A. F., Weffort, E. F. J., Flores, E. S., & Silva, G. P. (2012, May). Earnings management and economic crises in Brazilian capital market. Proceedings of the Annual Congress European Accounting Association, Slovenia, 35. Retrieved from www.caa2012.org/defaulg.asp?sCode=LOGIN&item=CF&association_id=2 Newspaper: Example: Simão, E. (2004, June 19). Déficit chega a R$ 33,6 bi em 2006. Gazeta Mercantil, A6. Federal Constitution: Example: Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm Laws: Example: Lei n. 6.404, de 15 de dezembro de 1976. Dispõe sobre as sociedades por ações. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6404compilada.htm Technical standards: Example: ABNT NBR 14724, de 17 de março de 2011. Informação e documentação – trabalhos acadêmicos – apresentação. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. |
Citation Rules
|
The most common types of citations are exemplified below. Omitted cases, see American Psychological Association (APA), 7th edition, 2020. Direct or textual citation with less than 40 words: must be included in the text paragraph, in quotation marks. The text reproduced must appear in double quotation marks, with an indication of the author(s), of the page(s) and reference to the consulted work. Example: De acordo com Bruno (2001), “a citação deve reproduzir o fraseado, a ortografia e a pontuação interna da fonte original, mesmo quando a fonte contém erros” (p. 112). Direct or textual citation with 40 words or more: must appear without quotation marks in a paragraph in block format, with each line indented five spaces from the left margin. Example: Castro (2001) explica que: vocabulários estruturados são coleções de termos, organizadas segundo uma metodologia na qual é possível especificar as relações entre conceitos com o propósito de facilitar o acesso à informação. Os vocabulários são usados como uma espécie de filtro entre a linguagem utilizada pelo autor e a terminologia da área e também podem ser considerados como assistentes de pesquisa, ajudando o usuário a refinar, expandir ou enriquecer suas pesquisas, proporcionando resultados mais objetivos. (p. 51) For quotations longer than 500 words, reproduction of one or more figures, tables or other illustrations, the type of license adopted by the original publication must be sought and, if applicable, written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for reproduction (in cases where the copyright belongs to the magazine or the congress). Permission must be addressed to the author of the submitted work, who must send a copy of it with the manuscript. The direct quote must be accurate, even if there are errors in the original. If this happens and runs the risk of confusing the reader, the word [sic] must be added, in italics and in square brackets, right after the error. Omission of material from an original source must be indicated by three dots, separated by spaces (“. . .”). Inserting material, such as comments or observations, must be enclosed in square brackets. Emphasis on one or more words must be in italics, followed by [our italics]; Citation of citation: must present the expression “cited by” to identify the secondary source that was actually consulted. Whenever possible, avoid this type of quotation, giving preference to the original reading. Example: Para Matos (1990, citado por Bill, 1998), ou Para Matos (1990), citado por Bill (1998). Citation of statements or interviews: the statements must be presented in italics and their form must follow the guidelines for textual citation; Citation with two authors: must be presented by the last names of the authors linked by & when placed in parentheses. When cited in the text, they must be linked by “and”, followed by the year of publication; Citation with three to five authors: when they appear for the first time in the text, all authors are cited. In the following quotes, the first author's surname is placed followed by the expression “et al.”; Citation with six or more authors: indicate only the first author, followed by the expression “et al.”. In the references, mention up to seven authors, in the order they appear in the publication. If the number of authors is eight or more, cite the name of the first six, insert three points and add the name of the last author; Citation of several authors to the same idea: cite the authors following the alphabetical order of their surnames; Citation of authors with the same last name: the sequence of citations must be in alphabetical order of the authors' first names. If there are still coincidences, the first names are written in full;
Citation of informal channels (class, conference, e-mail, etc.): cite personal communications only in the text, providing the initials, the last name of the communicator and a date as accurate as possible; Example: O mal-estar na civilização aborda o sofrimento humano por meio da análise da origem da dor. Freud (1930/1979) argumenta que a dor originada do corpo é combatida pela química, a originada do desejo insatisfeito é a dor proveniente das nossas relações com os outros, a que mais fere. Citation of works about to be published (in press): the name of the author is cited and the expression “in press” is placed in parentheses; Homepage or website citation: the electronic address must be cited after the information. Example: Retrieved from http://www.usp.br/sibi Citation of classic works: Examples: Author as part of the text: Homer exults the people: “Bravos, my children! Watch always thus; let no one give in to sleep. . .” (Iliad, X, 173).Author is not part of the text: “Bravos, my children! Watch always thus; let no one give in to sleep. . .” (Homer, Iliad, X, 173). Citation of textual verses - original edition: “Non iam coniugum . . .” (Virgil, Aeneid, IV, 431-434). Note: In the following quotes, if made on the same page, indicate only the book or corner number and the verse(s), or page numbers, as the case may be; Citation with omission of part of the text: ellipses (separated by spaces) must be used in a clause to indicate omission of material in the original source. Use four dots to indicate omission between two sentences - the first dot indicates the end of the first sentence and the other dots ellipses. Do not use an ellipsis at the beginning or end of quotations. Example: De acordo com Chauí (1996), em nossa sociedade a memória é valorizada e desvalorizada. É valorizada com a multiplicação dos meios de registro e gravação dos fatos, acontecimentos e pessoas (computadores, filmes, vídeos, fitas cassetes, livros) e das instituições que os preservam (bibliotecas, museus, arquivos). A desvalorização da memória aparece, por fim, no descaso pelos idosos, considerados inúteis e inservíveis em nossa sociedade (pp. 127-128). |
Contact
|
Federação Brasileira de Psicodrama |
